The Learned Colleagues' Club by Edulaw

Legal practice is pressure heavy by nature but that doesn’t mean burnout and mental overload should be the price of entry. In this episode, Roxanne and Monica sit down with Sonja Cilliers (advocate) and Maryke Swarts (neuro + mindset coach), the duo behind the Performance Mind Resilience Institute (PMRI), to unpack why traditional legal training leaves out the most important tool lawyers have: the brain.
 
The guests break down what goal setting actually needs to look like for lawyers — including why values-based goals stick, why unrealistic goals trigger resistance, and why tiny habits beat big motivational speeches every time. The conversation also explores cognitive overload, why modern legal work is uniquely mentally taxing, and how the profession’s “badge of suffering” culture quietly damages performance, health, and even client outcomes.

Key takeaways:
Legal work isn’t just stressful — it’s cognitively demanding in a way most people underestimate.
Being “busy” isn’t the same as being effective (and overload is not a personal failing).
Goals work best when they’re aligned with your values and not external expectations.
If your goal feels unrealistic, your brain will resist it (even if you want it).
Writing goals down and reviewing them regularly is a non-negotiable for follow-through.
Journaling helps reduce mental clutter and supports clarity, focus, and self-awareness.

🧠About PMRI (Performance Mind Resilience Institute)
The Performance Mind Resilience Institute (PMRI) is co-founded by advocate Sonja Cilliers and neuro + mindset coach Maryke, and focuses specifically on cognitive training for legal professionals. PMRI is not a generic wellness initiative — their work is rooted in neuroscience-based tools designed for the legal brain, helping lawyers manage cognitive overload, improve focus, prevent burnout, and build sustainable performance. Their resources include webinars, articles, and training for individuals, candidate attorneys, and law firms. You can find their recorded goal-setting webinar and other resources on their website: www.pmri.co.za.

🔗 Follow PMRI
Website: www.pmri.co.za
Instagram: @sa_pmri

🔗 Our Links
Instagram: @edulawsa Newsletter: https://edulaw.kit.com/
The Learned Colleagues WhatsApp Community: https://chat.whatsapp.com/GhONYNBERUt436AUNWB21b

In this episode of The Learned Colleagues Club, Monica and Roxanne tackle one of the most stressful and least explained admin hurdles for candidate attorneys: PVT (Practical Vocational Training) registration.

If you’re fresh out of varsity, newly employed, or already drowning in work as a CA, this episode is your calm, practical walkthrough of everything the LPC expects from you — and what can go very wrong if you delay or miss a step.

We cover what PVT actually is (and why no one tells you about it at university), who qualifies as a principal, which documents you must submit, and the common mistakes that can cost you extra months of articles.

In this episode, we break down:
What PVT is and how it differs from “articles”

Why PVT registration is often overlooked — and why it matters

Who can legally act as your principal (and why you should double-check)

A full checklist of documents required by the LPC

Certified copies, originals, and when “wet ink” is non-negotiable

Character references: who to ask and what the LPC expects

Rights of appearance explained (district vs regional courts)

The two-month deadline and how missing it can extend your articles

Practical admin tips to protect yourself (copies, scans, cover letters)

Submitting in person vs legal couriers

Real CA mistakes we wish we’d avoided (so you don’t repeat them)

This episode is designed to make the process feel less intimidating, less confusing, and far more manageable — especially if you’re already overwhelmed trying to learn how to be a candidate attorney.

Whether you’re about to start PVT, already signed your contract, or helping a junior colleague through the process, this is one episode you’ll want to save and share.

📩 Got a costs de bonis propriis story of your own? DM us on Instagram @edulawsa - we promise to share anonymously.

🎧 If this helped you, please share it with a colleague or CA who needs it.

📸 Instagram
Follow us for episode updates, practical tips for candidate attorneys, and behind-the-scenes content.
👉 @edulawsa

📰 Newsletter
Get bite-sized legal insights, career guidance, and episode highlights delivered straight to your inbox.
👉 Sign up to our newsletter: https://edulaw.kit.com/

In this episode, Roxanne Shear and Monica De Oliveira pull back the curtain on one of the most stressful (and strangely under-explained) moments in a young lawyer’s life: the admission application.

Between side-eyeing the LPC’s admin failures and sharing hard-won war stories from their own journeys, they break down what really goes into getting admitted — from documents and deadlines to police clearances and pecuniary interests.

This isn’t a dry checklist episode. It’s a practical, honest conversation about how the system actually works, why it often doesn’t, and how you can protect yourself while navigating it. Whether you’re six months into articles or six weeks from issuing your application, this episode gives you the clarity (and courage) you need to get through admission with your sanity intact.

Key Takeaways
Start early or suffer later. Admission applications should be drafted months before your articles end, not days.

Admin wins cases. Missing documents, wrong dates, and sloppy annexures are what cause LPC queries and court delays.

You don’t have to do this alone. Using an attorney of record or getting help with drafting is smart, not weak.

The LPC system is messy, plan for it. Expect queries, vague instructions, and last-minute stress unless you prepare properly.

Police clearance certificates are required. Yes, really.

Integrity is non-negotiable. Courts will forgive mistakes, they won’t forgive dishonesty.

Admission is overwhelming and that’s normal. But with the right support, it doesn’t have to break you.

In this episode of the Learned Colleagues Club podcast, Roxanne Shear and Mónica De Oliveira pull back the curtain on life after law school — the good, the messy, and the “why did nobody warn us about this?” moments.

They get real about the post-LLB job hunt, the pressure to “make it,” the hunt for decent mentorship (spoiler: it’s harder than it should be), and how to build a legal career that doesn’t drain your soul by 30. The conversation also dives into unconventional career paths for law grads who are quietly wondering if traditional practice is really the dream.

Equal parts practical, comforting, and refreshingly honest, this episode is your reminder that you’re not behind, broken, or failing. You’re just early in the journey.

Key Takeaways (a.k.a. Things We All Needed Someone to Say Earlier):

The post-LLB job market is… brutal. You’re not imagining it.

Mentorship isn’t a luxury — it’s a career lifeline.

You can be sucessful and still choose a non-traditional path (shock, horror).

A fulfilling career doesn’t come from titles alone, it comes from fit, values, and sanity.

Yes, the profession is saturated. No, that doesn’t mean you’re doomed.

Managing money expectations early can save you future heartbreak.

Networking and personal branding aren’t cringe — they’re necessary to stand out.

Burnout is not a badge of honour. Mental health is part of professional success.

The reality of practice is very different from varsity, and that’s okay.

The lawyers who thrive are the ones who never stop learning (or adapting).

Keywords
LLB, law graduates, legal careers, mentorship, job hunting, alternative law careers, young lawyers, legal profession, career survival guide

Summary:
If you have ever wondered how evictions work in practice, this episode is for you. In this episode of The Learned Colleagues' Club podcast, Advocate Joshua Barlow joins hosts Roxanne Shear and Monica de Oliveira to discuss the intricacies of residential evictions. They explore the legal framework, including the PIE Act, and share practical insights on managing the eviction process, client expectations, and the human side of eviction law.

Takeaways:
Understand the PIE Act's role in evictions.
Evictions require careful legal procedures.
Client management is crucial in eviction cases.
Evictions can be emotionally challenging.
Legal frameworks protect both landlords and tenants.
Preparation is key for successful evictions.
Evictions involve multiple legal steps.
Communication with clients is essential.
Legal professionals must navigate complex emotions.
Evictions highlight the balance of rights.

Keywords:
residential evictions, PIE Act, eviction process, legal framework, client management