Verdict with Ted Cruz

Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton! If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.

Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

Getting Fat on Fraud

Clay and Buck discuss the Supreme Court’s oral arguments on Temporary Protected Status for migrants from Syria and Haiti. The hosts frame the case as a straightforward question about whether the federal government can end a program explicitly labeled temporary. They criticize attempts to turn the issue into a racial debate and argue that U.S. immigration policy often punishes American generosity by transforming short‑term protections into long‑term residency expectations.

From immigration, the discussion moves into a detailed critique of SNAP benefits, welfare spending, and Medicaid. Clay highlights that SNAP recipients can receive roughly $800 per month in food assistance, totaling nearly $10,000 per year, and compares this to average annual income in countries like Iran. The hosts argue that the scale of U.S. welfare programs has created powerful incentives for migration and dependency, while also noting that Medicaid is the largest driver of state‑level debt without producing measurable improvements in health outcomes. They share examples from listeners and former caseworkers describing how individuals with substantial assets can still qualify for full benefits under current rules.

DEI Discriminates Against Whites

Clay and Buck discuss a Supreme Court case involving Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and immigration law, where the hosts analyze exchanges about how race is defined in legal arguments. This evolves into a broader critique of DEI policies, affirmative action, and identity politics, with Clay and Buck arguing that racial classifications used in public policy are inconsistent and difficult to define in practice. They extend this discussion into Democratic Party strategy, suggesting that identity-based politics plays a dominant role in candidate selection and could shape future election cycles, including speculation about Vice President Kamala Harris’s political trajectory.

The hour also features significant listener engagement, including calls discussing interstate migration trends, particularly individuals leaving states like Virginia and New York for Florida. Callers cite factors such as infrastructure, governance, cleanliness, and overall quality of life, reinforcing a recurring theme of population shifts driven by political and economic differences between states. Another caller introduces a conversation about race relations in South Africa, prompting the hosts to discuss broader global examples of racial politics and societal tension.

Saritha Wants to Save NYC

An interview with Republican candidate Saritha Komatireddy, who is running for New York Attorney General. The discussion focuses heavily on crime, public safety, and legal policy in New York State. Komatireddy criticizes current Attorney General Letitia James, arguing that political priorities have detracted from core responsibilities like enforcing the law and keeping residents safe. The conversation covers issues such as repeat offenders, subway crime, homelessness, and prosecutorial policies, with Komatireddy outlining plans to strengthen enforcement, create specialized crime units, and restore what she describes as accountability in the legal system. The hosts frame the race as competitive, pointing to voter dissatisfaction and concerns about rising crime.

FL Gov. Ron DeSantis

A wide-ranging interview with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, covering redistricting, population migration, tax policy, and national political comparisons. DeSantis discusses Florida’s updated congressional map, arguing that it corrects prior constitutional issues related to racial gerrymandering and results in more compact, legally sound districts. He also addresses the ongoing population boom in Florida, noting that migration from other states has strengthened, rather than weakened, Republican political advantage.

The conversation expands into housing affordability, insurance reform, and infrastructure challenges, with DeSantis outlining steps taken to stabilize insurance markets, reduce premiums, and accelerate major road and infrastructure projects to support rapid population growth. A key policy discussion centers on property tax reform, including a proposal that could lead to eliminating property taxes on homesteaded primary residences. DeSantis frames this as a major effort to return financial control to homeowners and limit government revenue expansion.

The interview also touches on national political strategy, comparing Florida’s governance model with states like California, and positioning Florida as a blueprint for conservative policy success. DeSantis addresses speculation about his political future while also discussing his involvement in efforts to reform college athletics, particularly around NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) policies, pointing to growing momentum in Congress for legislation that would bring structure and stability to college sports.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay and Buck: https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton on Social Media:
X - https://x.com/clayandbuck
FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/
IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck
TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Scope of Fraud
The testimony describes large‑scale, systemic fraud within Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP).
Individual childcare centers allegedly billed hundreds of thousands to over $1 million annually, often with no real children present.
2. Organized and Long‑Running Scheme
Fraud was not isolated or accidental; it showed characteristics of a loosely organized criminal enterprise operating for years (at least 2014–2019).
Some perpetrators reportedly learned about the scheme before arriving in the U.S., indicating cross‑border knowledge of vulnerabilities in the system.
3. Common Fraud Methods
Billing for nonexistent children and extended hours (e.g., multiple shifts, 7 days a week).
Operating “paper” childcare centers that closed immediately once payments were stopped.
Kickback arrangements involving parents, co‑owners, or employees.
Reusing addresses and reopening under new business names after enforcement actions.
4. Evidence Gathered by Investigators
Physical surveillance showed centers operating without children or staff.
Electronic evidence (texts, phones, computers) revealed admissions of fraud and intent to profit.
Investigations led to multiple felony convictions, including at least one federal case with prison time and restitution exceeding $1 million.
5. Overwhelming Volume of Fraud
Investigators received so many credible tips that they had to prioritize only the highest‑dollar cases.
Centers billing less than ~$700,000 often could not be addressed due to limited resources.
6. Internal Resistance and Obstruction
According to the whistleblower, senior DHS officials discouraged, undermined, or obstructed investigations once fraud became large and visible.
Actions alleged include: Attempts to alter or suppress information sent to the Legislative Auditor
Harassment and intimidation of investigators
Organizational changes that reduced investigators’ authority
Procedural delays that significantly reduced investigative capacity

7. Retaliation Against Whistleblowers
Investigators who pushed fraud cases reportedly faced: Threats and bullying
Negative performance actions
Loss of decision‑making power

The whistleblower ultimately resigned, stating he would not be complicit.
8. Failure of Oversight
The testimony suggests institutional tolerance of fraud, contrasting sharply with standards enforced in law enforcement agencies.
The whistleblower emphasizes that minor theft would not have been tolerated in his prior roles, while millions in losses were allowed to continue at DHS.
9. Federal Intervention
Federal agencies (FBI, IRS‑CI, HHS‑OIG) eventually became involved due to the scale and nature of suspected crimes.
Raids, indictments, and convictions occurred after years of state‑level warnings.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. King Charles III’s Visit to the U.S.
King Charles addresses a joint session of Congress, becoming only the second British monarch to do so (after Queen Elizabeth II in 1991).
The visit is symbolic of deep historical and constitutional ties between the U.S. and the U.K., especially as America approaches its 250th anniversary.
Shared Anglo-American legal traditions (Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights, John Locke).
The irony of honoring a British monarch given America’s revolutionary origins.

King Charles is portrayed as: Surprisingly humorous and personable, using dry British wit.
Well-received across party lines, including Democrats who previously opposed “monarchy symbolism.”

President Trump is quoted praising the King’s speech and leveraging the visit to reinforce themes of heritage, liberty, and national identity.
2. FBI Raids on Alleged Somali Fraud Operations
The FBI conducts 22 raids in Minnesota, reportedly targeting childcare centers accused of defrauding federal programs.
Allegations include: Billing for childcare services not provided.
Large-scale misuse of taxpayer funds.
Claims that some funds were diverted abroad (including alleged terrorism links—presented as accusations, not proven facts).

Specific political figures (e.g., Ilhan Omar, Governor Tim Walz) are accused by the speakers of: Ignoring, enabling, or benefiting politically from the alleged fraud.

Ben and the Senator praise the Department of Justice and Trump administration for aggressive enforcement, framing it as overdue accountability.
Welfare recipients owned luxury vehicles (Tesla, Porsche, Lamborghini, Ferrari, etc.).
Exploited eligibility loopholes like Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE).
Weak identity and asset verification enabling fraud.

The welfare system is: “Fraud by design,” incentivized to maximize dependency rather than enforce eligibility.
Poorly monitored by Democratic-led states.

The narrative argues for tighter controls, asset checks, and stricter enforcement.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Teachers’ Unions as Political Power Brokers
Major teachers’ unions (e.g., NEA, AFT) have contributed over $1 billion to left‑wing political causes over the past decade.
This funding overwhelmingly supports Democratic candidates, progressive activism, and ideological causes unrelated to education.

Education System as Ideological Indoctrination
Unions have shifted from focusing on education (reading, writing, math) to political indoctrination of students.
Declining academic performance is linked to this ideological focus rather than educational reform.

Coerced Union Participation
Teachers are forced to contribute union dues and face professional consequences if they dissent, framing this as coercive or unethical.

Link Between Education, Ideology, and Political Violence
Left‑leaning control of education has normalized hatred of conservatives, Christians, and Donald Trump.
There is a direct causal line between: union political spending,
ideological education,
polling data suggesting some Democrats justify political violence,
and alleged assassination attempts on Donald Trump.


Normalization of Political Violence
25% of Democrats believe political violence can be justified.
This reflects a broader cultural shift allegedly driven by education and political messaging.

Democratic Strategy Framing
Democrats deliberately pursued a “long game” by controlling education from elementary school through universities to shape future voters.
Education institutions are culture‑shaping tools rather than neutral public services.

Call to Parental Action
This is a warning to parents for continued and increased involvement in school boards.
This activism is a response to loss of trust, lack of accountability, and ideological overreach.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A Third Assassination Attempt:
This is the third attempted assassination against President Donald Trump, crediting the Secret Service and law enforcement for stopping the suspect.

Attribution of Responsibility to Political Rhetoric:
Violent acts are being fueled by inflammatory rhetoric from Democrats, left‑leaning media figures, and progressive commentators, who are normalizing or encouraging political violence.

Focus on Specific Statements and Figures:
Remarks by Democratic leaders, media personalities, and online commentators that are endorsing or joking about violence, using these examples to argue that such language has real‑world consequences.

Characterization of the Suspect:
The alleged attacker is described as ideologically motivated rather than mentally ill, portrayed as a “radicalized” individual influenced by left‑wing ideology, academic environments, and media narratives about Trump and Republicans.

Praise of Trump’s Response:
President Trump acted with restraint and leadership after the incident, calling for unity, peaceful resolution of differences, and respect for free speech, even while enduring hostile questioning from the media.

Criticism of Media Conduct:
Media outlets and journalists are irresponsibly repeating accusations from the attacker’s manifesto and reinforcing narratives that the speakers believe contribute to further radicalization.

Broader Warning About Political Climate:
Escalating rhetoric, ideological indoctrination, and tolerance of violent language are creating a dangerous environment where political figures and public events increasingly require heightened security.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.