The Perceptive Photographer

Before getting into today’s episode, I want to acknowledge the passing of Jeff Schewe. Jeff’s contributions to the photographic community were immense, and his passion for the craft touched countless photographers worldwide. I learned so much about printing and processing from Jeff. He will be deeply missed, and my thoughts are with his family, friends, and everyone whose life he influenced through his teaching and work.
On a happier note, congratulations to Makeda Best, who recently stepped into a wonderful new role as the photo curator at the MOMA. I can’t wait to see the programming, exhibitions and content that the photo department puts out under Makeda’s watch. She has a great background and has curated several really interesting projects and exhibitions in the past. 
As for today’s podcast topic, we are exploring a simple idea: the photographs we almost make are, in some ways, one of our greatest barriers to our true work. Most photographers think their biggest mistakes happen after pressing the shutter, things like exposure errors, missed focus, or weak composition. But the greatest loss is the image we never make at all. We see something interesting, pause for a moment, and then let hesitation talk us out of taking the photograph.
My biggest issue is that I sometimes expect something better down the road. For Others, we’re uncertain whether the scene is worth photographing. Sometimes we’re distracted. Whatever the reason, the moment passes, and the photograph exists only in memory.
This week, I’ll explore why hesitation may cost us more images than technical mistakes and how learning to trust our curiosity can lead to richer photographic experiences. After all, some of our favorite photographs are often the ones we almost walked past.
Thanks for listening, and as always, keep seeing the world through your images as gifts that keep giving. 

Photographers often hear that they should “shoot with intention.” I agree with this for the most part, but thought it might be a great topic for today’s episode of the Perceptive Photographer (episode #586). Like I said, I do agree that there is some intention always at play, but I don’ think we always know that intention before we pickup the camera. Sometimes, we learn about that process when editing, processing or writing about our work and more important than that, intention doesn’t always begin as a fully formed idea.

More often, it starts as curiosity or awareness of something we like to photograph and then moves to intention. You know, you get a feeling, a subject that keeps drawing your attention. You may not know why you’re photographing something but you know that it matters enough to return to it again and again.

We make photographs because something catches our eye, and only later, through editing and reflection, do we discover the themes, questions, and emotions that connect the work. What initially felt random often reveals a deeper intention over time. This is why it’s important to trust the creative process. Not every photograph needs a detailed plan behind it. Sometimes the act of photographing is how we uncover what we’re trying to say.

It is in the work that we sometimes find our intention. As we become more aware of it, we can move more and more towards using it as an active part of our process rather than a passive approach. Intention matters, but it isn’t always a map, and eventually it can move us towards a deeper understanding of our work.

In this episode of the podcast, 585, I talk about something that has come up in conversations several times over the past few weeks with different friends and colleagues: the challenge of photographing familiar places.

There’s a tendency in photography to believe the next great image exists somewhere else. So we travel to new cities, another country, or another landscape. We just want something new, but some of the most meaningful photographic work comes from returning to the same places over and over again until they begin to reveal something deeper.

Familiarity can make us stop paying attention. We move through our neighborhoods, parks, and daily routines sort of zoned out and not really paying attention. As photographer, we become convinced there is nothing new left to see. Yet if we let it, the camera has a remarkable ability to slow us down and reconnect us with the ordinary. When we revisit a location repeatedly, our attention shifts away from novelty and toward nuance. We can start to see the changing light, the shift of the seasons, weather, mood, gesture, rhythm, and timing of a place.

Over time, the work stops being about documenting a place and becomes more about understanding our relationship to it. The photographs become less about where it was taken and more about how we see it and feel about it.

In Episode 584 of The Perceptive Photographer, I dig into some ideas about how photography is ultimately about creating connection. Sure, a camera can record information, but meaningful photographs ask something deeper of us. They change how we relate things in the frame, such as people, objects, emotions, and ideas, into new ways that create coherence and resonance. I would argue that photographers create a connection twice: first visually, then emotionally.

Visual connections are the relationships within the frame. What most of us call composition. Visual connections guide the viewer through the image. Foreground and background, leading lines, repetition, light, color, layering, and perspective all work together to unify a photograph and create movement for the eye. Even something as simple as where we choose to stand changes the emotional and visual relationships within the image. Your point of view is never neutral; it shapes how the viewer experiences connection.

As we consider the visual connection, it is both a support for and supportive of the emotional and conceptual connection, the layer that gives a photograph meaning beyond aesthetics. The images that stay with us are often the ones that connect to something larger than what is visible: memory, identity, vulnerability, tension, or shared experiences. These images drive the importance of presence and how people can often sense when a photograph was made with genuine attention rather than simple observation.

Where these two forms of connection intersect and align, the strongest photographs are found when composition and meaning reinforce one another, where visual choices deepen emotional impact. At its best, photography becomes more than a thing on a screen or a piece of paper; it becomes a bridge between the subject, the photographer, and the viewer.

On this week’s episode of The Perceptive Photographer, I talk about the idea that editing may be one of the most personal parts of photography. Not that behind the lens isn’t important, but long before someone knows anything about us, they can often sense something in the way we process an image. After all that is a part of what we emphasize, what we remove, and how we shape what we see in the light, color, and mood of an image.

In the classic photography example of seeing, two photographers can stand in the same place and, in this case, capture nearly identical RAW files. They go home and when we next see them and their images, they have created completely different photographs in the editing process. One may lean into contrast and drama, while another chooses softness and ambiguity. Neither approach is right or wrong. Each simply reveals a different way of seeing.

So as you think about how your approach your work and those ideas becomes an act of being who you really are, start to think about how color grading can reflect emotional memory more than visual accuracy, and why our edits might say as much about who new are as the click behind the camera. I also wanted to leave you a little home work so I also talk about how revisiting old images can reveal changes not only in our style, but in who we have become over time.

Photography is often described as a way of documenting the world. But editing reminds us that photographs are also reflections of the people making them.