The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

In this episode Ben examines remarks from Cori Bush about using the Equal Rights Amendment to protect abortion and transgender rights, review the political debate surrounding the amendment, discuss Democratic polling challenges, and assess what these debates could mean for voters and upcoming elections. The episode also looks at criticism directed at Democratic leaders, reactions to foreign policy debates involving Iran, and controversy surrounding a proposal for city-owned grocery stores in New York City that would require proof of residency for participation.
Former Representative Cori Bush argues that the Equal Rights Amendment should become the 28th Amendment and says it could be used to protect abortion rights and transgender rights. The debate highlights a broader fight over constitutional change, cultural issues, and the future direction of the Democratic Party.In this episode, the focus is on whether Democratic candidates are moving toward more progressive policy goals ahead of key elections and how those positions may resonate with voters. The discussion centers on constitutional questions, election messaging, and the political consequences of embracing controversial policy priorities.
Topics Covered:
Cori Bush's call to advance the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment
Debate over abortion rights and transgender rights under the ERA framework
Democratic Party messaging and voter reactions ahead of elections
Comments from Mark Kelly on the Iran conflict and Democratic polling challenges
Debate over voter ID versus residency requirements in New York City policy proposals
Broader discussion about progressive policy priorities and constitutional change
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Cruz and Ben break down the week's biggest political stories, assess debates shaping the Democratic Party, examine the controversy surrounding government-run grocery stores in New York City, and discuss reports that Democratic attorneys general coordinated legal challenges to Donald Trump before his return to office.
A new Democratic Senate candidate in Maine, a proposal for government-run grocery stores in New York City, and newly reported coordination among Democratic attorneys general before the 2024 election are at the center of this Week in Review. Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson revisit several of the stories that generated the most discussion during the week and explain why they believe those developments could have broader political consequences.
The episode begins with the Maine Senate race, where Cruz and Ferguson argue that Democratic leaders replaced one controversial candidate with another who shares many of the same ideological positions. They discuss reactions from national Democratic figures and examine what those endorsements reveal about the direction of the party. The conversation then shifts to New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's proposal for government-run grocery stores. Cruz and Ferguson review details from a public request-for-proposal document, debate the logistics of operating city-backed stores, and question whether the model could achieve its stated goals without creating new costs and complications.
The episode also highlights commentary from figures including Bill Maher and Van Jones, whose recent remarks are presented as evidence of growing debate within Democratic circles about the party's future direction and messaging. In the final segment, Cruz and Ferguson discuss a report alleging that a coalition of Democratic attorneys general began preparing legal strategies against a potential second Trump administration months before the 2024 election. They examine the timeline, the lawsuits that followed, and what they believe it says about the political and legal battles surrounding President Donald Trump.
Topics Covered:
The Maine Senate race and Democratic candidate Troy Jackson
National Democratic reactions to controversial candidates
Zohran Mamdani's government-run grocery store proposal
Public procurement and operational concerns in New York City
Bill Maher and Van Jones on the future of the Democratic Party
Reports of coordinated legal action by Democratic attorneys general against Donald Trump
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Documents and public reporting are fueling new questions about whether Democratic attorneys general were preparing legal challenges to a second Trump administration months before the 2024 election was decided. Ben argues the coordination raises broader concerns about the use of the courts, the role of state attorneys general, and the balance between legal oversight and political opposition. Ben Ferguson examines allegations that nearly two dozen Democratic attorneys general began organizing potential litigation strategies against Donald Trump well before Election Day 2024. They discuss reporting on a coordinated effort known as the “Project for Federal Accountability,” the wave of lawsuits filed against the Trump administration since January 2025, and the political and constitutional implications of those legal battles.
In this episode Ben discusses newly reported details about pre-election planning by Democratic attorneys general, debate whether the lawsuits against the Trump administration constitute legitimate oversight or organized lawfare, review the financial costs and legal outcomes of those cases, and explain why they believe the issue could become a major factor in upcoming elections.
Topics Covered:
Reporting on Democratic attorneys general coordinating legal strategies before the 2024 election
The “Project for Federal Accountability” and multi-state litigation efforts
Nearly 100 lawsuits filed against the Trump administration since January 2025
The constitutional role of state attorneys general in challenging federal actions
Costs to taxpayers and the political debate surrounding legal challenges
Potential implications for voters, elections, and the 2026 midterms
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss a Senate hearing focused on the Muslim Brotherhood, allegations of ties between certain advocacy organizations and Islamist movements, the Democratic primary victory of Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, cultural controversies surrounding James Talarico's Texas Senate campaign, and reports that Democratic attorneys general coordinated legal strategies against Donald Trump before the 2024 election was decided. They examine the political implications of these developments and argue that each reflects larger battles over national security, cultural values, and the future direction of American politics.
A Senate hearing on the Muslim Brotherhood and its alleged influence in the United States sparks controversy after Democratic members of the subcommittee decline to attend. The discussion raises questions about national security, political alliances, and how terrorism-related concerns are being debated in Washington.
The episode also examines newly surfaced campaign footage involving James Talarico, the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Texas, and a broader debate over cultural issues, LGBTQ events, and the role of identity politics in modern campaigns.
Finally, attention turns to documents reported to show coordination among Democratic state attorneys general to prepare legal challenges against Donald Trump prior to his return to office, raising questions about lawfare, federal authority, and the political use of litigation.
Topics Covered:
Senate hearing on the Muslim Brotherhood and Democratic boycott of the proceeding
Testimony regarding CARE, the Holy Land Foundation, and terrorism-related allegations discussed at the hearing
Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed and concerns raised by hearing witnesses about organizational ties
James Talarico's Texas Senate campaign and controversy surrounding participation in a Pride event
Reports of coordinated litigation planning by Democratic attorneys general against Donald Trump
Debate over national security, political coalitions, and the use of legal challenges in partisan conflicts
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

New polling shows continued majority support for the SAVE Act, a proposal that would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. Supporters argue the measure reflects broad public agreement that only citizens should vote, while critics continue to raise concerns about its impact and implementation. With the bill stalled in the Senate despite House approval, the debate is becoming a key issue ahead of future elections.
The episode also examines a series of Democratic primary results in Michigan that Ben Ferguson argues signal a major ideological shift within the Democratic Party. He points to victories by candidates aligned with democratic socialist and progressive movements, despite significant spending and support from party establishment figures.
In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss new polling on the SAVE Act, the legislative battle over voter citizenship verification requirements, Senate Republican efforts to advance the bill, and what recent primary election outcomes could mean for the future direction of the Democratic Party. They analyze voter sentiment, campaign spending, establishment-versus-insurgent political battles, and the growing influence of democratic socialist candidates in key races. Topics Covered:
New Rasmussen polling on voter support for the SAVE Act
Senate gridlock over proof-of-citizenship voting legislation
Voter attitudes toward election integrity and citizenship requirements
Michigan Democratic primary results and establishment spending
The victory of Abdul El-Sayed over Haley Stevens in Michigan
The growing influence of Democratic Socialist-aligned candidates
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.