The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

1. “Micro‑Looting”
Some progressive commentators and media voices have normalized or morally justified small‑scale theft (“micro‑looting”) from large corporations.
This behavior is a broader ideological shift on the left that excuses antisocial or criminal conduct by blaming systemic injustice.
Justification undermines social order and property rights, drawing parallels to looting during the 2020 protests.
2. Criticism of Progressive Media and Elites
Liberal hosts and commentators are wealthy or privileged individuals who hypocritically present themselves as defenders of the poor.
Their rhetoric is performative, radical, and disconnected from everyday consequences.
We condemn perceived casual endorsements of violence, sabotage, or theft expressed in podcasts and commentary.
3. Escalation From Rhetoric to Violence
Inflammatory political language—particularly on the left—has contributed to real‑world violence.
The concept of “stochastic terrorism” is that left‑wing rhetoric against Donald Trump has radicalized individuals.
Examples cited include assassination attempts, threats against conservative figures, and political murders, all attributed to progressive demonization.
4. Democratic Leaders Portrayed as Using Violent Language
Multiple Democratic politicians and commentators are quoted using aggressive or absolutist language (e.g., “we have to stop him,” “choke them out,” “eliminate him”).
The media and journalists are enabling or excusing this rhetoric rather than condemning it.
5. Media Complicity and Hypocrisy
Mainstream outlets (e.g., CNN, ABC, late‑night shows) are portrayed as biased and dismissive of violence against conservatives while amplifying fear‑based messaging.
Jokes or dismissive coverage related to attacks on Trump are cited as evidence of moral double standards.
Journalists are helping create the ideological environment that motivates violent actors.
6. James Comey Indictment Narrative
Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted a second time.
The indictment reportedly centers on a social media post showing “86 47” formed from seashells, interpreted as a threat against the 47th president (Trump).
Prosecutors allegedly view “86” as slang for “get rid of” or “kill,” framing the post as a threat transmitted across state lines.
7. Reopening of Russia Investigation Scrutiny
The discussion revisits the 2016 Russia investigation, portraying it as a “collusion hoax.”
New criminal probes are now examining the conduct of investigators themselves, including Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan.
Allegations include abuse of intelligence powers, false statements, and mishandling of evidence.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Secret Service Funding & Political Conflict
The U.S. Secret Service stopped an alleged assassination attempt and they were underfunded due to Department of Homeland Security budget disputes.
Democrats repeatedly voted against DHS/Secret Service funding, framing this as irresponsible given security risks.
This political rhetoric contributes to political violence.
Discusses legal opposition to construction of a White House ballroom with enhanced security features.
The court’s temporary halt to construction is portrayed as dismissive of national security concerns.
There are repeated threats against President Trump as justification for heightened security.
3. Radicalization & Political Violence Narrative
Attributes recent acts of political violence to left‑wing ideology and alleged “Marxist” indoctrination in academia.
Cites a purported manifesto to argue that ideological framing of “oppressors vs. victims” is used to justify violence.
4. FBI Raids and Minnesota Fraud Allegations
FBI raids on over 20 childcare and nonprofit facilities in Minneapolis related to alleged large‑scale fraud.
The fraud is involving misuse of taxpayer funds, particularly in programs tied to childcare and social services.
Minnesota political leaders are accused of ignoring or covering up fraud while later taking credit for enforcement.
There is widespread abuse of SNAP (food stamp) benefits, including recipients allegedly owning high‑end luxury vehicles.
The federal eligibility rules (broad‑based categorical eligibility) are at fault for enabling fraud.
Both fraudsters and policymakers who support current rules should be held accountable.
Democratic officials are benefiting politically from fraud & welfare expansion.
Specific figures are cited as symbols of incompetence, corruption, or ideological extremism.
7. DEI Policies & Homelessness Programs
Describes homelessness assistance systems, particularly in Portland, Oregon, as driven by DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) scoring systems.
Aid is prioritized based on race, sexuality, or identity over economic need leads to ineffective outcomes.
Despite very high spending per homeless individual, homelessness‑related deaths increased significantly.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

How BBCE Works:
Federal law requires asset and income checks for SNAP eligibility.
Under BBCE, if a person qualifies for any form of state-designated assistance, they are automatically eligible for SNAP.
States exploit this by creating minimal “benefits” (e.g., pamphlets, hotlines, informational flyers) that legally trigger SNAP eligibility.

Scale of the Issue:
Over 40 states use BBCE.
Millions of SNAP recipients reportedly exceed federal income or asset limits.
Roughly 1 in 5 enrollees allegedly have assets of $100,000 or more (per the source’s claims).
Taxpayer cost is described as hundreds of millions to billions of dollars annually.

Fraud Characterization:
The system is “fraud by design”, not accidental mismanagement.
The program no longer focuses on the “truly needy” but instead expands enrollment intentionally.

Additional SNAP Abuse Allegations:
EBT skimming and theft by organized criminal groups.
Trafficking: selling SNAP benefits for cash.
Improper payments due to administrative errors (claimed ~12% rate in FY 2024).
Multi-state fraud, identity fraud, and use of deceased individuals.
Retail fraud, where stores exchange benefits for cash.
International criminal involvement in benefit theft.

Luxury Vehicle Example:
Cites a single state where 14,000 SNAP recipients allegedly owned luxury vehicles, including Ferraris, Bentleys, Lamborghinis, Porsches, Teslas, and others—used to illustrate misuse.

Government Response:
USDA and law enforcement conducting investigations and theft replacement.
Movement toward chip-based EBT cards for security.
Claimed removal of 4.3 million people from SNAP rolls due to fraud detection.
USDA food and nutrition administration being reorganized and moved closer to states.

Political Framing:
Blames Democratic-led states and policies for expanding SNAP to increase voter dependency.
Claims “blue states” resist data transparency.
Frames SNAP reform as a central midterm election issue.

Proposed Reforms:
Eliminate or restrict BBCE.
Reinstate asset tests and stricter income limits.
Tighten work requirements.
Reduce enrollment to focus on genuinely needy households.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Supreme Court Ruling on Racial Gerrymandering
A 6–3 Supreme Court decision invalidated Louisiana’s congressional map because it relied on race-based district drawing, which they describe as unconstitutional.
The ruling is a landmark rejection of racial gerrymandering, asserting that race should not be a controlling factor in redistricting, even when justified under the Voting Rights Act.
Democrats oppose the ruling because racial districting allegedly benefits their electoral prospects.
2. Maine Democratic Senate Primary Controversy
Democratic Governor Janet Mills withdrew from a U.S. Senate race because she could not defeat a more extreme primary challenger.
That challenger is a self-identified communist with a Nazi tattoo and a history of inflammatory online statements.
This reflects radicalization within the Democratic Party, asserting that extreme ideological views are now tolerated or rewarded in Democratic primaries.
3. DEI-Based Homeless Policy (Portland, Oregon)
Homeless services in Portland/Multnomah County, resource allocation is guided by DEI and “intersectionality” scoring systems.
Factors such as sexual identity, race, and language status are prioritized over income level or length of homelessness.
Despite large public spending per homeless individual, homeless deaths increased sharply, which the speakers attribute to ideological mismanagement rather than effectiveness.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Scope of Fraud
The testimony describes large‑scale, systemic fraud within Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP).
Individual childcare centers allegedly billed hundreds of thousands to over $1 million annually, often with no real children present.
2. Organized and Long‑Running Scheme
Fraud was not isolated or accidental; it showed characteristics of a loosely organized criminal enterprise operating for years (at least 2014–2019).
Some perpetrators reportedly learned about the scheme before arriving in the U.S., indicating cross‑border knowledge of vulnerabilities in the system.
3. Common Fraud Methods
Billing for nonexistent children and extended hours (e.g., multiple shifts, 7 days a week).
Operating “paper” childcare centers that closed immediately once payments were stopped.
Kickback arrangements involving parents, co‑owners, or employees.
Reusing addresses and reopening under new business names after enforcement actions.
4. Evidence Gathered by Investigators
Physical surveillance showed centers operating without children or staff.
Electronic evidence (texts, phones, computers) revealed admissions of fraud and intent to profit.
Investigations led to multiple felony convictions, including at least one federal case with prison time and restitution exceeding $1 million.
5. Overwhelming Volume of Fraud
Investigators received so many credible tips that they had to prioritize only the highest‑dollar cases.
Centers billing less than ~$700,000 often could not be addressed due to limited resources.
6. Internal Resistance and Obstruction
According to the whistleblower, senior DHS officials discouraged, undermined, or obstructed investigations once fraud became large and visible.
Actions alleged include: Attempts to alter or suppress information sent to the Legislative Auditor
Harassment and intimidation of investigators
Organizational changes that reduced investigators’ authority
Procedural delays that significantly reduced investigative capacity

7. Retaliation Against Whistleblowers
Investigators who pushed fraud cases reportedly faced: Threats and bullying
Negative performance actions
Loss of decision‑making power

The whistleblower ultimately resigned, stating he would not be complicit.
8. Failure of Oversight
The testimony suggests institutional tolerance of fraud, contrasting sharply with standards enforced in law enforcement agencies.
The whistleblower emphasizes that minor theft would not have been tolerated in his prior roles, while millions in losses were allowed to continue at DHS.
9. Federal Intervention
Federal agencies (FBI, IRS‑CI, HHS‑OIG) eventually became involved due to the scale and nature of suspected crimes.
Raids, indictments, and convictions occurred after years of state‑level warnings.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.