Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

The no-confidence vote was 241 to zero. The Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to invoke a state statute compelling sworn testimony. The recall campaign is active. And yet the legal mechanism that's supposed to force accountability may contain the very loophole that lets Sheriff Chris Nanos survive it.
This week we look back at the most significant developments in the Nancy Guthrie case. The statute the Board invoked — Arizona Revised Statute § 11-253, a territorial-era provision — triggers removal for non-compliance. Nanos said he'll comply. If he shows up and submits sworn statements — regardless of what those statements contain — the board may have no legal path to remove him under this specific mechanism. County attorneys are currently working through that question. April 7 is when the answer takes shape. Supervisor Matt Heinz called Nanos's 42-year career "fruit of a poison tree" and said his December 2025 deposition testimony — in which Nanos reportedly stated he had never been suspended, despite documented records showing eight suspensions during his time with the El Paso Police Department — is disqualifying. But disqualifying in public opinion and disqualifying under statute are not the same thing. That gap is where this fight will be decided.
And while the institutional crisis consumes the investigation's credibility, the person at the center of it deserves to be known for more than a missing poster. Nancy Guthrie was a Kentucky native who fell in love at a basketball game, followed her husband around the world, and built a life in the Arizona desert for five decades. When he died at 49, she was 46 with three children and no career. She went to work at the University of Arizona. She created a program that brought live music into a hospital. She became a leader in public relations. She raised a fighter pilot, a poet, and one of the most recognized journalists in America. She was a 30-year churchgoer whose absence one Sunday morning triggered the investigation the world now watches.
That's the Nancy this case is about. The woman, not the headline.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #NoConfidenceVote #MissingPerson #NanosRecall #FindNancy

The timeline of Josh Duggar's adult life reads like a case study in how systems protect people until they can't anymore. He leveraged his television fame into a political career lobbying Congress on behalf of conservative Christian family values. He was the executive director of FRC Action, the political arm of the Family Research Council. And the entire time, according to the federal case that eventually brought him down, something else was happening on his work computer.
This week we look back at the concluding chapters of our five-part Duggar examination. Before the federal charges, Josh's trajectory included a 2015 civil lawsuit alleging serious misconduct, settled without court adjudication. That same year, his conduct toward minors — documented in a police report from years earlier — became public. The Ashley Madison data breach followed, revealing a paid account. Josh resigned from FRC Action and made a public statement admitting infidelity and describing a pornography addiction.
In April 2021, federal agents arrested him at his home while his wife was seven months pregnant with their seventh child. At trial, the investigating agent testified that the material recovered from Josh's work computer included images of children as young as eighteen months — material the agent described as among the most serious he had encountered. Guilty verdict: December 2021. Sentence: approximately twelve and a half years. Appeal denied. Currently incarcerated in Texas.
Then the pattern repeated. In March 2026, Joseph Duggar was arrested on felony charges after a now-14-year-old victim disclosed alleged molestation during a 2020 family vacation. According to the Bay County arrest affidavit, Joseph allegedly admitted the conduct twice — to the victim's father and to detectives. He is presumed innocent and faces proceedings in Florida.
The full accounting across this series: Bill Gothard — more than 34 accusers, zero criminal charges, denies everything, 91 years old, still online. Josh's earliest victims — no criminal prosecution for those acts. Jim Bob — testified under oath at Josh's pretrial hearing that he couldn't remember, found not credible by a federal judge in writing, no legal consequences. IBLP — never charged, still operating. Joseph's case — active, presumed innocent. One system built this. The record shows what it protected.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#JoshDuggar #JosephDuggar #DuggarFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FederalConviction #IBLP #BillGothard #JimBobDuggar #DuggarPattern

The numbers in this case tell a story the medical system apparently couldn't read while it was unfolding. Approximately thirteen medications prescribed in roughly four months. A psychiatric appointment lasting approximately 17 minutes on a video screen the day before three children died. A dosage increase at the end of that call. And a woman who had been asking for help — using the clinical vocabulary of her own profession — at every stop along the way.
This week we look back at the most critical chapters in the Lindsay Clancy case. Before January 24th, 2023, Lindsay Clancy was a labor and delivery nurse who recognized what was happening to her and sought treatment repeatedly. According to the civil lawsuits filed by both Lindsay and her husband Patrick in January 2026, her postpartum symptoms escalated across three pregnancies. Anxiety after Cora. Bipolar symptoms that, according to expert analysis cited in the lawsuit — from Columbia University psychiatry professor Dr. Margaret Spinelli — first emerged after Dawson's birth and went undiagnosed. Then Callan arrived in May 2022, and her family said she became a different person entirely.
The medical timeline documented in the lawsuits is devastating. In December 2022, Lindsay admitted herself to a day program at Women & Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, where she reported being deeply depressed and numb to all emotion. A doctor there ruled out postpartum depression and bipolar disorder — a conclusion the lawsuit attributes to an inadequate patient history. That assessment is now central to the prosecution's first-degree murder case. On New Year's Eve, she was admitted to McLean Hospital's locked unit. She reportedly waited three days to see a doctor. She was discharged after five days. Eleven days later, auditory hallucinations returned — a voice telling her she would never be the same and the only option was to die.
Both civil lawsuits describe the care Lindsay received as a disorganized, uncoordinated course of polypharmacy — brief virtual appointments that failed to capture the severity of her condition, a failure to coordinate among providers, and a failure to involve the family members who were watching her deteriorate in real time.
Lindsay faces three counts of first-degree murder. Her trial is scheduled for July 2026. A judge recently denied her request for a bifurcated trial. Postpartum psychosis remains absent from the DSM.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #MedicalMalpractice #MaternalMentalHealth #DuxburyCase #MentalHealthAwareness #Polypharmacy #TrueCrimePodcast

The system came first. Then the family. Then the silence. Understanding what happened inside the Duggar household — across three generations — requires understanding the organization that shaped how they thought, how they raised children, and how they handled harm.
This week we look back at the most critical examinations in our ongoing Duggar series. Bill Gothard founded the Institute in Basic Life Principles in 1961 and led it for approximately six decades. He was never ordained. Never married. Held no theological credentials. But at the peak of his influence, his seminars filled arenas with ten thousand attendees per city and earned endorsements from sitting governors. IBLP's published doctrine described leaving paternal authority as witchcraft. Their homeschool curriculum — used by the Duggar family — deliberately excluded sex education and abuse recognition frameworks. More than 34 women have accused Gothard of serious misconduct and abuse. He has denied all of it. A civil lawsuit was dismissed on statute of limitations grounds in 2018. In 2025, the Texas Supreme Court ruled a separate lawsuit against Gothard and IBLP could proceed. He is 91 years old and has never faced a criminal charge.
The family that made IBLP famous had its own generational history. Amy Duggar King's 2025 memoir "Holy Disruptor" reveals that Jim Bob's father, Jimmy Lee Duggar, was identified within the family as someone who should never be around children. Amy wasn't allowed to be alone with him. Her grandmother locked her bedroom door at night. Her mother Deanna didn't explain why until after Jimmy Lee's death in 2009. According to Amy, Jimmy Lee was also violently abusive toward Deanna — and Jim Bob was present during at least one of those incidents. He knew.
Amy also describes discovering disturbing material on Josh Duggar's old laptop and telling Jim Bob, who according to Amy dismissed it. Federal investigators later asked about that same device. Amy named the generational pattern in her book months before Joseph Duggar's arrest. A family member called her "troublesome" for writing it. Two members of this family now face criminal charges involving minors. One is in federal prison. The doctrine, the patriarch, and the pattern are inseparable.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#DuggarFamily #BillGothard #IBLP #AmyDuggarKing #HolyDisruptor #JimmyLeeDuggar #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JimBobDuggar #ReligiousAbuse

A mother sits on national television and says she believes the ransom notes are real. The evidence says something different. That gap — between what a grieving daughter needs to believe and what the forensic record actually shows — is the most important tension in the Nancy Guthrie case right now, and it demands honest examination.
This week we look back at the most compelling developments in one of the most closely watched missing persons investigations in the country. Savannah Guthrie told Hoda Kotb she believes the two ransom communications her family responded to came from whoever took Nancy. Those notes contained references to Nancy's Apple Watch and a damaged floodlight at the home. But the FBI's lead agent publicly noted those details were available information. The Bitcoin wallet in the ransom demand has never recorded a transaction. Both deadlines passed without follow-through. The family begged publicly for proof of life and received nothing. Meanwhile, Derrick Callella, a 42-year-old California man, was arrested on federal charges for sending fraudulent ransom texts after following the case on television — a pattern that echoes historical cases like the Lindbergh kidnapping and the Getty ransom, where high-profile abductions attracted waves of opportunistic fraud.
Running parallel to the evidentiary questions is an institutional collapse. Sheriff Chris Nanos' own deputies voted 241 to zero to demand his resignation after reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM revealed he was suspended eight times during his tenure with the El Paso Police Department in the late 1970s and early 1980s, accumulating 37 days of suspension for excessive force, illegal gambling, and insubordination before resigning to avoid termination. Those records, according to the reporting, went undisclosed for over four decades. The Board of Supervisors has voted unanimously to compel sworn testimony from Nanos, with removal as a consequence. A former U.S. Surgeon General and ex-Pima County sheriff has publicly accused Nanos of compromising the crime scene. A recall effort is underway.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down what the ransom communications actually tell investigators, what they don't, and what this case looks like from the inside of an agency in crisis.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #RansomNotes #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #FBIInvestigation #DerrickCallella #MissingPerson