Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Eric Richins called his business partner on Valentine’s Day 2022 with fear in his voice. He’d just eaten a sandwich his wife made him and couldn’t breathe. He broke out in hives. He grabbed his son’s EpiPen. And he told his friend what he believed was happening: his wife was trying to end his life. Two weeks later, he was dead. In part two of our five-part definitive series, we dissect the plan behind Kouri Richins’ murder of her husband — a plan built on three pillars. The affair with a handyman she controlled financially and emotionally. The $2.2 million in life insurance she stacked on Eric’s life through forged applications and secret policies. And the fentanyl she procured in escalating doses through her housekeeper, each purchase confirmed by cell phone location data that neither woman thought to hide. This is the story of how a suburban mom who couldn’t spell “fentanyl” obtained enough of it to ensure her husband would never wake up again.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#KouriRichins #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #FentanylPoisoning #EricRichins #MurderPlan #ValentinesDayPoisoning #AffairRevealed #UtahTrueCrime #JusticeForEric

The evidentiary landscape across these three cases reveals patterns that your questions have been tracking with precision. From forensic trace analysis in the D4VD case to chain of custody disputes in Idaho to excluded alternative suspect evidence in Delphi, the investigative details expose alleged systemic gaps at every level.
In the D4VD case, prosecutors say LAPD’s Trace Analysis Unit found plastic from an inflatable pool lodged in wounds on Celeste Rivas Hernandez’s remains. Amazon and Postmates records allegedly tie the purchase of that pool, along with chainsaws, a body bag, and a burn cage, to David Anthony Burke under the alias Victoria Mendez. Burke has pleaded not guilty and maintains he did not cause Celeste’s death.
In Idaho, the defense forensic scientist who reviewed the Ka-Bar knife sheath alleges the evidence bag was documented retroactively and that the chain of custody was legally insufficient. The FBI confirmed that a hair found near one of the victims does not belong to Bryan Kohberger. It has reportedly never been fully processed.
In Delphi, Richard Allen’s reply brief details what the defense says the jury was denied: the composite sketch, testimony challenging bullet-matching evidence, audio from Allen’s solitary confinement, the Kegan Kline catfish connection, and evidence pointing to alternative suspects whose interviews were allegedly recorded over and whose weapons were never collected.
Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski take listener questions across all three cases, connecting the forensic, investigative, and procedural threads your messages keep pulling.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#D4VD #BryanKohberger #DelphiMurders #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #ChainOfCustody #ListenerQA #CelesteRivasHernandez #RichardAllen

The twenty-three million dollar settlement is the single most-cited fact in the Michael Jackson saga. His defenders say it proves nothing except that his team wanted the circus to end. His accusers say no innocent person signs that check. Both arguments have weight. And neither one settles the question.
This episode takes you through the 1993 Chandler case with the kind of detail that forces you to grapple with both possibilities. The recorded phone call where Evan Chandler threatens to destroy Jackson before his son has allegedly disclosed anything. The timeline that shows a lawyer and a psychiatrist were involved days before any accusation was made. The twenty-million-dollar demand that came before any police report. And then the counterweight: the DA investigated Evan for extortion and filed no charges. The settlement explicitly allowed Jordan to testify in criminal proceedings. And Jordan Chandler — the boy at the center of everything — never recanted, never testified, never spoke publicly again, and sought legal emancipation from both of his parents.
If Evan fabricated everything, why did Jordan refuse to take it back? If Jackson was guilty, why did the physical evidence from the strip search remain disputed? This episode sits in the space where those questions don’t have comfortable answers.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#MichaelJackson #JordanChandler #Neverland #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MJAccusations #ChandlerCase #ExtortionTape #StripSearch #KingOfPop

The investigative record in the Delphi case contains gaps that Richard Allen’s defense team argues are not accidental. According to the reply brief filed with the Indiana Court of Appeals, investigators allegedly recorded over an interview with an alternative suspect. That individual’s weapon was never collected. His phone was never searched. And the trial court ruled that presenting him as an alternative suspect was “speculative” — a characterization Allen’s attorneys challenge by asking how something can be speculative when it was never actually investigated.
The brief identifies three categories of constitutional error. First, the search warrant: Allen’s attorneys allege law enforcement omitted and altered witness descriptions in the probable cause affidavit to make Allen match the “Bridge Guy” profile captured on Libby German’s phone. Second, the confessions: Allen made statements during what his attorneys describe as solitary confinement that produced psychosis and grave disability. The jury was shown video of Allen in confinement but the audio was muted — they could not hear what the defense describes as confused, disjointed screaming while a prosecution psychologist testified the confessions were logical and organized. Third, the excluded evidence: Kegan Kline’s catfish account, reportedly the last to contact Libby before she was killed, was ruled a separate investigation.
The defense has requested oral arguments before the three-judge appellate panel. The State’s position characterizes each alleged error as “harmless.” Allen’s attorneys counter that the cumulative effect denied him his Sixth Amendment right to present a complete defense.
Robin Dreeke and I address your questions on the investigative gaps, the evidentiary exclusions, and what oral arguments could mean for this conviction.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #Appeal #ConstitutionalRights #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #AbbyAndLibby #IndianaCourt #ListenerQA #ExcludedEvidence

They cut off the money. They stopped the visits. They let the public defender take over. Insiders say they consider him "Satan incarnate." And yet the surviving Reiner siblings — Jake, Romy, and Tracy — are reportedly telling the DA's office not to seek the death penalty against the brother accused of stabbing their parents to death. Because Rob Reiner believed in something. And his children are carrying that belief forward even when it directly benefits the person accused of taking him away.
That collision — between abandonment and protection, between grief and principle — is at the center of this episode. Tony Brueski examines what Nick Reiner's most recent court appearance revealed about the state of this case. The hearing lasted minutes. Nick said one word. The judge pushed the next date to September. The autopsy reports on Rob and Michele are still not finished. And the preliminary hearing that determines whether this even reaches a trial is nowhere close to being scheduled.
Meanwhile, Jake Reiner's Substack essay has become the most detailed account from inside this family's grief. He wrote about the phone calls from Romy, the unendurable ride to the family home, his father's authenticity, his mother's laughter, and the fear his parents must have felt. He doesn't mention Nick by name — just "my brother," once, in a paragraph about unconditional love. On the other side of that restraint, Globe magazine reports that Nick allegedly wants to publish a revenge tell-all naming names and exposing what he calls his parents' sordid secrets.
One family. Two completely opposite responses to the same catastrophe. And a legal system that won't resolve any of it for months — if not years.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NickReiner #JakeReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ReinerCase #BrentwoodMurders #DeathPenalty #ReinerFamily