I keep thinking about what kind of identity would be useful for building a powerful animal advocacy movement. Here are 3 features of veganism that I often think about which make me doubt its usefulness.Too maximalist The official definition of veganism by the inventors of the term is the following: “Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose” This basically amounts to "avoid doing bad things as far as possible." The threshold sits right below what is impossible. I think that is way too ambitious. Doing the best possible thing at every circumstance shouldn’t be the criterion for inclusion to a social movement. We don't expect human rights activists to avoid all forms of exploitation and cruelty as far as possible to qualify as human rights activists. Some activists respond "No, veganism is the bare minimum. The 'as far as possible and practicable' part means it's not about being perfect.". But when I ask for examples of gratuitously harmful actions that veganism doesn't forbid, at most I hear about instances of accidental uses [...] ---Outline:(00:22) Too maximalist(03:37) No space for believers to sin(04:29) Too behaviour-focused ---
First published:
November 26th, 2025
Source:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/BX8hPeye2QRcyftRk/3-doubts-about-veganism
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
--------
5:44
--------
5:44
“The funding conversation we left unfinished” by jenn
People working in the AI industry are making stupid amounts of money, and word on the street is that Anthropic is going to have some sort of liquidity event soon (for example possibly IPOing sometime next year). A lot of people working in AI are familiar with EA, and are intending to direct donations our way (if they haven't started already). People are starting to discuss what this might mean for their own personal donations and for the ecosystem, and this is encouraging to see. It also has me thinking about 2022. Immediately before the FTX collapse, we were just starting to reckon, as a community, with the pretty significant vibe shift in EA that came from having a lot more money to throw around. CitizenTen, in "The Vultures Are Circling" (April 2022), puts it this way: The message is out. There's easy money to be had. And the vultures are coming. On many internet circles, there's been a worrying tone. “You should apply for [insert EA grant], all I had to do was pretend to care about x, and I got $$!” Or, “I’m not even an EA, but I can pretend, as getting a 10k grant is [...] ---
First published:
December 10th, 2025
Source:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/vpPee6NgMbPcdsam3/the-funding-conversation-we-left-unfinished
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
--------
4:56
--------
4:56
“Front-Load Giving Because of Anthropic Donors?” by Jeff Kaufman 🔸
Summary: Anthropic has many employees with an EA-ish outlook, who may
soon have a lot of money. If you also have that kind of outlook, money
donated sooner will likely be much higher impact.
It's December, and I'm trying to figure out how much to donate. This is usually a
straightforward question: give 50%. But this
year I'm considering dipping into savings.
There are many EAs and EA-informed employees at Anthropic, which has
been very successful and is reportedly
considering an
IPO. The Manifold
market estimates a median IPO date of June 2027:
At a floated $300B valuation and many EAs among their early employees,
the amount of additional funding could be in the billions. Efforts
I'd most want to support may become less constrained by money than
capacity: as I've experienced in running the NAO, scaling programs takes time.
This means donations now seem more valuable; ones that help
organizations get into a position to productively apply further
funding especially so.
In retrospect I wish I'd been able to support 80,000 Hours more substantially
before Open Philanthropy Coefficient
Giving began funding them; this time, with more ability to see
what's likely [...] ---
First published:
December 3rd, 2025
Source:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/rRBaP7YbXfZibSn3C/front-load-giving-because-of-anthropic-donors
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
--------
2:03
--------
2:03
“Peter Wildeford talks about risks from AI on the Daily Show” by MartinBerlin
Ronny Chieng strikes again, this time featuring Peter Wildeford and the risks from AI on the Daily Show: ---
First published:
December 5th, 2025
Source:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/epuSKFdGD82cxZAGd/peter-wildeford-talks-about-risks-from-ai-on-the-daily-show
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
--------
0:31
--------
0:31
“Caring about Bugs Isn’t Weird” by Bob Fischer
I’ve spoken with hundreds of entomologists at conferences the world over. While there's clearly some self-selection (not everyone wants to talk to a philosopher), my experience is consistent: most think it's reasonable to care about the welfare of insects. Entomologists don’t regard it as the last stop on the crazy train; they don’t worry they’re getting mugged; they don’t think the idea is just utilitarianism run amok. Instead, they see some concern for welfare as stemming from a common-sense commitment to being humane in our dealings with animals. Let's be clear: they embrace “some concern,” not “bugs have rights.” Entomologists generally believe it's important to do invasive studies on insects, to manage their populations, to kill them to document their diversity. But given the choice between an aversive and a non-aversive way of euthanizing insects, most prefer the latter. Given the choice between killing fewer insects and more, most prefer fewer. They don’t want to end good lives unnecessarily; they don’t want to cause gratuitous suffering. It wasn’t always this way. But the science of sentience is evolving; attitudes are evolving too. These people work with insects every day; they constantly face choices about how to catch insects, how [...] ---
First published:
November 23rd, 2025
Source:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/4FncrGhQKcuFthxiR/caring-about-bugs-isn-t-weird
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
Audio narrations from the Effective Altruism Forum, including curated posts and posts with 125 karma.
If you'd like more episodes, subscribe to the "EA Forum (All audio)" podcast instead.