EA Forum Podcast (Curated & popular)

Why I stopped donating to animal welfare charities but feel more motivated than ever to redirect money and talent to the cause.
I have wanted to write this post for a while. It is an uncomfortable thing to bring up. Many people in the animal welfare space are working really hard, and this post might leave some feeling defeated. But I think this is one of the most important things to talk about in animal welfare right now. My intention is not to be a downer or create infighting. Instead, I hope this post inspires lots of people to tackle this major neglected problem.
key takeaways
Even some of the most prominent animal welfare interventions have surprisingly weak evidence behind them. In some cases, the available evidence even suggests that the intervention may be causing harm.
Specifically We have very limited data on electrical shrimp stunning that doesn't support a confident conclusion as to whether it's good or bad.
We have mixed evidence on whether transitioning egg producers to cage-free improves welfare overall.
We have evidence that the substitution effect of alternative proteins is weak, at best.

Significant additional funding and talent should be allocated to raise [...]
---
Outline:
(00:44) key takeaways
(01:45) introduction
(02:29) three salient animal welfare interventions and their evidence bases
(03:17) shrimp stunning and slaughter
(11:01) cage-free
(20:29) alternative proteins
(21:47) this is a field-wide problem
(22:18) my recommendations to funders
(22:22) animal welfare should not be de-funded
(23:36) we should be taking ownership of the entire evidence pipeline
(24:49) when bet making doesn't make sense
(25:38) conclusion
---

First published:

June 5th, 2026


Source:

https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/svjqgyFuFQ34qSgmw/animal-welfare-has-an-evidence-problem

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

A new article went viral on Twitter today: Nan Ransohoff's "The Third Wave of American Philanthropy" (link). Worth reading first.
Nan is right about the shape of what's coming: hundreds of billions in new philanthropic capital, no ecosystem yet to absorb it, and a shortage of builders and organizations. I very much agree with that sentiment and the direction. More money, more people willing to start things, more urgency.
But the conclusion I draw is almost the opposite. The new philanthropic wave shouldn't go hunting for new problems. Far more of it should go to animals. There are literally trillions of lives suffering so gravely in all corners of the world. The future is still incredibly grim; AI can impose even more significant suffering if we don't do it right. "Animal welfare" isn't one solved issue to cross off: it's where most of the sentience and suffering is, and where we should be looking.
Animals are not one solved issue. It's not one issue
EAs recognized the importance of animal suffering – factory farming, wild animal suffering – long before the rest of the world, which still has not really recognized its importance. That was the insight. And [...]
---
Outline:
(01:10) Animals are not one solved issue. It's not one issue
(02:03) The problems are staring right at us
(04:12) AI x Animals
(05:23) Stop looking past them
---

First published:

May 20th, 2026


Source:

https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/HFkrGGGjbM7gFcQGD/after-making-sure-we-don-t-all-die-this-should-be-the-first

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

[Cross posted from my substack]
In their EA Forum post last year, CEA described their ‘principles-first approach to stewardship of the EA community’.
I'm a big fan of principles-first stewardship in principle. I think EA needs a steward, and I think that stewardship should be organised around EA's core principles.
But I think CEA's particular growth-centric approach to principles-first stewardship is stewarding EA in the wrong direction.
I think that: The key question for principles-first stewardship should be "Is EA a place that embodies and nurtures EA principles?" I think there are serious reasons to worry that it isn't such a place - that EA has become more ideological and less truth-seeking over time, and that growth focused approaches to community building like CEAs are a big part of the reason why.
A summary of my main points:
It seems to me that EA is dying. I’m less concerned here about growth metrics, and more concerned about the health of EA as a community and a moral/ intellectual project. It seems to me that EA is losing its question-nature, and also has become something that people are less and less willing to stand behind or participate [...]
---
Outline:
(04:16) It seems to me that EA is dying
(05:05) EA as a question
(06:26) EA as a community
(07:30) Various posts which inform my conception of EA death
(08:42) Growth is not "Community Building 101"
(10:20) The growth funnel model is in tension with open truth-seeking
(10:25) Targeting high impact careers and donations
(13:04) Selection effects
(15:20) Growth is only good if EA is functioning well
(17:23) EA community building doesn't serve the people who embody EA most deeply
(20:01) FTX was a trust problem, not just a brand problem
(22:14) CEA's brand strategy is in tension with open truth-seeking
(24:33) What principles-first stewardship could look like
---

First published:

May 28th, 2026


Source:

https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/xsffhcHoexJgH4h4X/my-disagreements-with-cea-s-approach-to-stewarding-ea

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Julia and I had been giving half since 2014, but in 2025 we drew on our savings to donate 81%. It looks to us like we're in a critical window for keeping the introduction of very powerful AI systems from being disastrous, and we want to do what we can while we still can.
Here's what that looks like in the context of our overall spending:
We've been prioritizing donations for a long time, but it feels very different now because of the AI boom. Some of this is that people who've made money in the boom will likely be giving more soon, and so money spent now can help set up organizations to spend future money more effectively. But more importantly, this is a key window of opportunity: transformative AI is coming very quickly, for better or worse. We want to push hard for "better".
If you compare to previous years (2024, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2016, 2014), we're donating a lot less than we used to in absolute terms:
Until mid-2022 I was working at a big tech company, optimizing to maximize donations, and now I'm at a non-profit. This means we're giving a larger fraction, but of [...]
---
Outline:
(04:07) Evaluating Predictions
(06:14) Making New Predictions
(08:11) Details
---

First published:

May 26th, 2026


Source:

https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/CmpfM8dubqsqEQic7/donating-80-while-it-still-counts

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

TL;DR: AIM is running its first incubation round focused exclusively on animal welfare, in partnership with Aaron Boddy (co-founder of Shrimp Welfare Project). It'll run in early 2027, and we’re on the hunt for all-star future founders — especially the ones who care about animal welfare but have been quietly assuming they're a bad fit for the cause.
Want to learn more? Drop into our office hours at EAG London this Saturday, 12–1pm (find it on Swapcard), or fill out our expression of interest form.
Curious about what this means for our global health and development work? The short answer: nothing's changing[1].
A program built to incubate transformational animal charities
This is the best-resourced and most fit-for-purpose version of AIM's program we've run for animal founders. Our charity incubation program was built to accommodate a wide range of types of charities, and we’ve long hypothesized that running rounds with a tighter focus could enable an even higher hit-rate of field-leading charities.
By focusing this round entirely on animal welfare, we can tailor the research process, founder recruitment efforts, and program content and support to what animal charities specifically need, instead of what works on average across cause areas. The [...]
---
Outline:
(00:56) A program built to incubate transformational animal charities
(01:50) Why now
(03:36) You don't need to be an "animal person"
(04:50) Why coming to this fresh is genuinely useful
(05:57) What we're looking to incubate
(07:04) Come find us
---

First published:

May 22nd, 2026


Source:

https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/afoobcsEYFKvYk3bp/why-now-might-be-the-best-time-ever-to-start-an-animal

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.