Bench Boost by Inorganic Ventures

Send us Fan Mail
This week Mike & Ashley review the standardized methods for elemental impurity analysis in pharmaceuticals: ICH Q3D, USP <232>, and USP <233>. ICH Q3D provides guidelines for testing up to 24 elements and emphasizes risk assessment but not detailed testing calculations; USP <232> sets elemental impurity limits; and USP <233> addresses sample preparation and analysis and relies on ICH Q3D concepts such as “J” concentrations (to be covered next week). They explain risk assessment factors (element, route of administration, intentional addition, and screened materials) and outline element classes. They also discuss sample types (APIs, drug products, excipients) and how early screening can reduce final testing needs.

Send us Fan Mail
The Inorganic Ventures team members answer more listener questions relevant to trace analysis. They address low mercury recovery at 2 ppb, noting mercury instability in nitric acid, adsorption to plastic, options such as preparing in HCl or stabilizing with ~1 ppm gold. They explain detection limit calculations using calibration data and blank replicates & distinguish instrument vs method detection limits, with suggestions to improve precision and sensitivity via conditions and sample introduction components. For heavy metals in blood studies, they warn of vacutainer/polypropylene contamination and recommend vessel leaching or vessel blank studies. Finally, they describe pH product certification against NIST standards, potential meter entry limitations, and temperature effects on calibration.

Send us Fan Mail
The Inorganic Ventures team answers listener questions focused on pharmaceutical elemental impurity analysis by ICP-MS. They explain why an indium internal standard becomes unstable in high-pH matrices due to insoluble hydroxide formation and how EDTA complexation can stabilize indium when used for iodine analysis. They discuss mercury washout problems caused by volatility, adsorption to sample introduction surfaces, memory effects, and redox/speciation, and emphasize proper rinse sequencing and the roles of chloride-based rinses and specialty solutions like ICP True Rinse to prevent carryover and failed QC checks. They address poor gold recovery during heated prep due to adsorption, reduction, and volatility. Finally, they advise diluting working standards in matrices that match samples while considering element stability and compatibility in stock matrices.

Send us Fan Mail
This week on Bench Boost Mike, Autumn, Micah, and Josh discuss common ICP-OES/ICP-MS issues in mining analyses and how to troubleshoot them by separating sample-prep from instrument root causes. Key sample-prep problems include incomplete digestion of refractory minerals, loss of volatile analytes, spitting, and adsorption/instability during transfers. They review contamination before jumping into issues borne from instrument assays; covering the topics of matrix effects from high TDS & mitigation via dilution, internal standards, matrix matching, and more. They also note how physical effects will impact nebulization or transport efficiency. QC pitfalls with non-matrix-matched standards, internal-standard limitations, and the importance of representative CRMs are discussed before the team provides a structured troubleshooting checklist including blanks, duplicate agreement, spike recovery, dilution linearity, and multi-wavelength/isotope agreement.

Send us Fan Mail
This week on Bench Boost Mike, Autumn, and Thomas dive deep into validation procedures for ICP-OES and ICP-MS methods. They discuss the importance of planning validation parameters early, understanding sample matrices & analyte levels, and achieving complete dissolution via appropriate digestions. They review the seven key validation parameters of accuracy, precision, detection limits, linearity, selectivity, robustness, and stability. They also outline best quality control practices including analyzing blanks, CCVs, duplicates, spikes, and implementing control charts.