Skip to content
PodcastsNewsThe Tech Savvy Lawyer

The Tech Savvy Lawyer

Michael D.J. Eisenberg
The Tech Savvy Lawyer
Latest episode

167 episodes

  • The Tech Savvy Lawyer

    🎙️ Ep. 139, From MyCase to Claude: Building a Secure, AI-Ready Tech Stack for Solo and Small Law Firms.

    2026/06/23 | 49 mins.
    My next guests are Gabriela "Gabby" Cubeiro, Senior Vice President of Product at 8am — the legal tech company behind MyCase, LawPay, CASEpeer, and DocketWise — and Majo Castro, founder and managing attorney at CastroMand Legal in Austin, Texas. 🌟 Gabby brings over 16 years of legal tech experience, including co-founding CASEpeer, and today leads product strategy for one of the most widely used law practice management ecosystems in the country. Majo is a Venezuelan-born cybersecurity and AI attorney whose firm helps growing companies navigate AI implementation, data management, and cybersecurity — and she's also the voice behind The Cyber Law Gal on Substack. 🔐 Together, they deliver a frank, peer-level conversation about building a tech stack that's both AI-ready and genuinely secure — without the hype and without the hand-holding.
    Join Gabriela "Gabby" Cubeiro, Majo Castro, and me as we discuss the following three questions and more!
    What are the top three integrations or workflows a solo, small, or midsize firm should expect from a modern cloud-based LPM platform like 8am — and what's missing that signals a real red flag around efficiency, cash flow, or security?
    As AI gets baked into cloud LPM tools like 8am, what are the top three day-to-day tasks that will change most for solo and small firm lawyers — and what basic security or ethical guardrails should they put in place to use those AI features without putting client data at risk?
    For solo and small firms without a CISO or CTO, what are the top three cybersecurity mistakes you see over and over again?
    In our conversation, we cover the following:
    [00:00:00] 🪝 Show Hook — Gabby's critical warning: if your firm hasn't "adopted" AI, your employees probably already have — on free consumer tools
    [00:00:00] Title read — Episode 139
    [00:01:00] Host intro: why this conversation goes tactical on AI, security, and LPM workflows
    [00:02:00] Guest introductions — Gabriela "Gabby" Cubeiro (8am/MyCase) and Majo Castro (CastroMand Legal / The Cyber Law Gal)
    [00:03:00] Majo celebrates 1.5 years as a solo practitioner 🎉
    [00:03:00] Ad: Five-star review request for The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page
    [00:03:30] Tech setups — Gabby's MacBook Air (M4 chip), iPhone Max, Slack, Zoom, Google Drive, Claude Enterprise
    [00:06:00] Gabby's portable USB-C external monitor for travel (Amazon, highest-rated)
    [00:09:00] Majo's MacBook Pro 14" M4 (16GB RAM), performance issues, upgrade path discussion
    [00:10:00] Michael recommends Onyx (free Mac maintenance utility); Michael's Mac Studio M3 Ultra with 256GB
    [00:11:00] Mac Mini and Mac Studio as desktop alternatives; MacRumors Buyer's Guide tip
    [00:13:00] Apple Business Account benefits — small discounts + white-glove service
    [00:15:00] Majo's full setup: iPhone 16 Pro Max, Google Workspace + Gemini (team account with DPA), DJI Osmo Pocket 3, Hollyland wireless mic
    [00:16:00] Q1: Top three LPM workflows — intake, secure client communication (client portal), and getting paid (trust accounting + automated invoicing)
    [00:19:00] Majo on switching from QuickBooks to MyCase after discovering QuickBooks mishandles trust accounting
    [00:20:00] 🎉 Gabby announces: AI case summary features are now LIVE in 8am/MyCase
    [00:21:00] Cloud vs. local access debate — SaaS uptime, SLAs, and asking vendors for proof
    [00:23:00] Michael's redundant backup strategy: Backblaze + Dropbox + local Mac Mini
    [00:25:00] Cautionary tale: ransomware attack converts a server-based firm to the cloud overnight
    [00:28:00] Majo's Google Drive third-party backup with 2-hour recovery window
    [00:29:00] Q2: How AI changes daily workflows — drafting, case summaries, surfacing critical info fast
    [00:30:00] Why reading vendor Terms of Service and activating Data Processing Agreements (DPAs) is non-negotiable
    [00:31:00] 8am's SOC 2 Type 2 compliance; updated AI terms and opt-in controls coming
    [00:32:00] SOC 2, HIPAA, end-to-end encryption as baseline vendor security requirements
    [00:34:00] AI as the great equalizer — leveling the playing field for solo firms vs. BigLaw
    [00:35:00] Majo's real data: ~12 hours saved last month across 27 consultations using Gemini for proposals
    [00:36:00] Plaud and Pocket AI recording devices — data retention, PII, and DPA concerns
    [00:37:00] Majo's stance on wearable AI recorders; Apple Watch comparison; one-party vs. two-party consent
    [00:39:00] Plaud's terms say no AI training — but it's not a DPA; terms can change without notice 🚨
    [00:40:00] Google Workspace DPA must be manually activated — most users don't know; creating user friction around protection
    [00:41:00] Q3: Top cybersecurity mistakes — shadow AI, no MFA, undertrained employees
    [00:42:00] Majo's checklist: DPA + no model training on client data + enterprise/team-tier subscriptions + MFA
    [00:43:00] Gabby: employees are the #1 security risk; fractional IT and CISO options for small firms
    [00:44:00] AI-powered phishing attacks on law firms will only intensify
    [00:45:00] Majo's training method: positive AI policies + 45-second staff video explainers 🎬
    [00:46:00] 🚨 Gabby's shadow AI reminder (Show Hook 🪝 callback): audit your tech stack — your team already has
    [00:47:00] Episode originally recorded at ABA Techshow; re-recorded after a technical snafu 😅
    [00:47:00] Where to find Gabby: LinkedIn, X, 8am.com, Kaleidoscope conference (September — banner at 8am.com)
    [00:48:00] Where to find Majo: LinkedIn (Majo Castro), CastroMand Legal, Substack: The Cyber Law Gal
    [00:48:30] Outro — michaeldj@thetechsavvylawyer.page | next episode in ~two weeks
    Resources
    Connect with Gabriela "Gabby" Cubeiro
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gabriela-cubeiro/
    Connect with Majo Castro
    CastroMand Legal (Austin, TX): https://www.castrolandlegal.com/
    The Cyber Law Gal Substack: https://www.linkedin.com/in/majocastro/
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/majocastro/
    Mentioned in the Episode
    ABA Techshow — https://www.techshow.com/
    Apple Business Account — https://www.apple.com/business/
    Apple Trade-In Program — https://www.apple.com/shop/trade-in
    Model Rules 1.1, Comment 8 — https://www.thetechsavvylawyer.page/search?q=comment%208
    MacRumors Buyer's Guide — https://buyersguide.macrumors.com
    Hardware Mentioned
    8am.com — https://www.8am.com
    Apple iPad — https://www.apple.com/ipad/
    Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max — https://www.apple.com/iphone-16-pro/
    Apple iPhone Max — https://www.apple.com/iphone/
    Apple Mac Mini — https://www.apple.com/mac-mini/
    Apple Mac Studio — https://www.apple.com/mac-studio/
    Apple MacBook Air — https://www.apple.com/macbook-air/
    Apple MacBook Pro 14 — https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/
    Apple Watch — https://www.apple.com/apple-watch/
    Backblaze — https://www.backblaze.com
    CASEpeer — https://www.casepeer.com
    ChatGPT (OpenAI, Enterprise referenced) — https://chat.openai.com
    Claude (Anthropic, Enterprise) — https://www.anthropic.com/claude
    DJI Osmo Pocket 3 — https://www.dji.com/osmo-pocket-3
    DocketWise — https://www.docketwise.com
    Dropbox — https://www.dropbox.com
    Google Drive — https://drive.google.com
    Google Workspace + Gemini — https://workspace.google.com
    Hollyland wireless mic — https://www.hollyland-tech.com
    LawPay — https://www.lawpay.com
    MyCase — https://www.mycase.com
    Onyx (free, Mac) — https://www.titanium-software.fr/en/onyx.html
    Plaud AI recorder — https://www.plaud.ai
    Pocket AI recorder — https://heypocket.com/pages/
    QuickBooks (referenced as insufficient for trust accounting) — https://www.quickbooks.intuit.com
    Slack — https://www.slack.com
    Zoom — https://www.zoom.us
  • The Tech Savvy Lawyer

    TSL.P Labs 🧪: Google Quick Share for Lawyers — Cross-Platform File Sharing Without Compromising Ethics

    2026/06/17 | 9 mins.
    Join us for an AI-powered deep dive into the ethical challenges facing legal professionals in the age of generative AI. 🤖 In this episode, host Michael D.J. Eisenberg breaks down Google Quick Share's new cross-platform capability — the feature that finally lets Android and Apple devices share files directly, peer-to-peer, without routing data through third-party servers. And yes, we cover every ABA rule you need to know before you touch that share button.

    In our conversation, we cover the following
    ·   [00:00] 📖 The problem: Why Android-to-iPhone file transfers have been a frustrating workflow bottleneck for law firms — and how Google Quick Share's latest update changes everything
    ·   [01:00] 🗺️ Road map overview — the six sections of today's explainer: The Tech Bridge, Step-by-Step Workflows, Real-World Law Practice scenarios, ABA Rules & Compliance, Practical Security Settings, and the Firm Roll-Out Checklist
    ·   [01:30] 🌉 Section 1 — The Tech Bridge: How Quick Share's peer-to-peer architecture works and why files never touch Google or Apple servers — a critical distinction for client data privacy
    ·   [02:00] 📱 Compatible hardware: Samsung Galaxy S and Z series, Google Pixel 8, 9, and 10, Vivo devices, and iPhones running the latest AirDrop enhancements
    ·   [02:30] 🔄 Section 2 — Step-by-Step Workflows: Sending from Android to iPhone in four steps — open the item, tap Share, select Quick Share, tap the iPhone's name; recipient taps Accept
    ·   [03:00] ↔️ Reversing the transfer — sending from iPhone to Android using AirDrop's new interoperability, where the Android device appears as a viable AirDrop target
    ·   [03:30] ⚖️ Section 3 — Real-World Law Practice: Actionable scenarios including beaming a signed retainer agreement from an Android phone to an iPhone-toting intake coordinator, and cross-platform trial prep for last-minute demonstratives
    ·   [04:00] 📋 Sharing documents directly to a client's phone in a meeting — regardless of operating system
    ·   [04:15] 🔍 Section 4 — ABA Rules & Compliance: ABA Model Rule 1.1 (Competence) — why not understanding Quick Share's privacy and visibility settings is an ethical violation, not just a tech oversight
    ·   [04:45] 🔐 ABA Model Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality) — why you must double-check the recipient device name before hitting send, and when peer-to-peer sharing is not appropriate for your most sensitive materials
    ·   [05:30] 👥 ABA Model Rule 5.3 (Supervision) — why you carry ultimate responsibility for how your staff uses mobile sharing tools, and the written BYOD policy you must have in place
    ·   [06:00] 🛡️ Section 5 — Practical Security Settings (Android): Three non-negotiable settings: change Quick Share visibility to Contacts Only or Hidden; require device unlock to accept transfers; immediately move received client files into your secure document management app
    ·   [06:30] 🍎 Practical Security Settings (iPhone): Set AirDrop to Contacts Only as your baseline default; if you temporarily open to Everyone, switch it back immediately; train staff to decline all unexpected AirDrop requests
    ·   [07:00] 📋 Section 6 — Firm Roll-Out Checklist: Five-step tactical deployment plan: (1) inventory devices, (2) force OS updates firmwide, (3) mandate default privacy settings, (4) hold a 30-minute staff training session, (5) define in writing which file types may and may not be shared via Quick Share
    ·   [08:00] 💡 Closing challenge: The technology to bridge Android and Apple is already in your pocket — the only barrier left is implementation. How will you lead the charge to modernize your firm's cross-platform collaboration without sacrificing your ethical shield?

    RESOURCES
    Mentioned in the episode
    ·       ABA Model Rule 1.1 — Competence: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_1_competence/
    ·       ABA Model Rule 1.6 — Confidentiality of Information: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_6_confidentiality_of_information/
    ·       ABA Model Rule 5.3 — Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistance: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_5_3_responsibilities_regarding_nonlawyer_assistance/
    Hardware mentioned in the conversation
    ·       Samsung Galaxy S Series: https://www.samsung.com/us/smartphones/galaxy-s/
    ·       Samsung Galaxy Z Series (foldables): https://www.samsung.com/us/smartphones/galaxy-z/
    ·       Google Pixel 8: https://store.google.com/us/category/phones
    ·       Google Pixel 9: https://store.google.com/us/category/phones
    ·       Google Pixel 10 (Pixel 1000 series): https://store.google.com/us/category/phones
    ·       Vivo Android Devices: https://www.vivo.com/en/
    ·       Apple iPhone (AirDrop-compatible, latest iOS): https://www.apple.com/iphone/
    Software & Cloud Services mentioned in the conversation
    ·       Google Quick Share (Android): https://android.com/better-together/quick-share-app/
    ·       Apple AirDrop: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102497

    ⚠️ Disclaimer: This episode is strictly educational and does not constitute legal advice. Laws, rules, and technology features change frequently. Always verify your state, local, and jurisdictional rules before implementing any new workflows in your firm.
    🎙️ Enjoyed this episode? Subscribe to The Tech-Savvy Lawyer wherever you get your podcasts, leave us a five-star review, and share this episode with a colleague who's still emailing files to themselves. Your ethical upgrade starts today.
  • The Tech Savvy Lawyer

    🎙️ Ep. 138: How US Legal Support Integrates AI, Security, and Remote Depositions into Your Litigation Tech Stack ⚖️💻

    2026/06/09 | 33 mins.
    My next guest is Jimmie Bridwell, an executive with US Legal Support, a nationwide litigation support company headquartered in Houston, Texas that provides remote deposition solutions, transcription services, record retrieval, trial technology, and graphics generation for law firms of all sizes. In this episode, we unpack how US Legal Support's technology platform integrates with law firm systems, why security and data management are non‑negotiable, and how AI‑assisted transcript and deposition tools are reshaping trial preparation and remote proceedings for modern litigators.📜🤖
    Join Jimmie Bridwell and me as we discuss the following three questions and more!
    What are the top three ways lawyers should expect companies like US Legal Support's technology platforms — whether remote deposition solutions, transcription services, or document management — to integrate seamlessly into a law firm's existing tech stack to eliminate duplicative data entry and streamline trial preparation?


    What are the top three technology investments or skillsets that lawyers consistently overlook, but would dramatically improve their practice efficiency and client services in 2026?


    Based on US Legal Support's experience facilitating over 245,000 remote events annually, what are the top three technology mistakes you see lawyers making during remote depositions or virtual proceedings, and how can they course correct to deliver more efficient client representation?
    In our conversation, we cover the following
         [00:00:00] Jimmie's current tech setup: Surface Pro laptop, 47‑inch curved Samsung monitor, HyperCast standalone microphone, and Logitech Brio camera in a Microsoft‑based office using Microsoft Cloud.📺🖥️
         [00:00:45] Working with both Android and Apple smartphones, and why Jimmie uses Apple for work due to perceived security and litigation hold considerations.
         [00:01:20] How US Legal Support deploys Apple computers in graphics studios while running a primarily Microsoft infrastructure and cloud environment across the enterprise.
         [00:02:00] Question 1 introduction: how US Legal Support's platforms should integrate into law firm tech stacks to reduce duplicate data entry and streamline trial workflows.
         [00:02:15] Why integration, security, and data management are the three primary pillars when transmitting client information between firms and service providers.
         [00:03:00] The risks of multiple data entry points and why centralized, consistent first input across the litigation lifecycle is critical.
         [00:03:40] US Legal Support's security posture: internal SOC 2 Type 2 validation, HIPAA compliance, NIST protocols, and reliance on Microsoft and Amazon cloud with SOC 2 Type 2 security.
         [00:04:40] Practical security questions solo and small firm attorneys should ask vendors about encryption at rest and in transit, security reviews, and penetration testing.
         [00:06:00] Data breach reporting expectations and the need for a published, timely breach notification process for clients.
         [00:07:30] Data management concerns: how vendors use client data, prohibitions on reselling data, and the importance of 24/7 self‑service access to discovery materials and litigation documents.
         [00:08:30] Integration realities: standard and customized APIs, multipoint‑to‑endpoint data flows, and why experience with case management integrations matters.
         [00:11:00] Question 2 introduction: the top three overlooked technology investments and skillsets that could dramatically improve practice efficiency and client service in 2026.
         [00:11:15] AI‑assisted transcript review: summarizing long depositions, key‑noting, keywording, and surfacing strategic themes to accelerate trial preparation.
         [00:12:20] Validating AI outputs, the attorney's continuing liability, and why AI‑assisted transcript review pulls from the deposition record rather than external sources, reducing hallucination risk.
         [00:14:10] AI‑assisted deposition preparation tool: ingesting exhibits, medical records, and discovery into a secure portal, generating case outlines, identifying pre‑existing conditions, and suggesting deposition questions in minutes instead of hours.
         [00:15:40] How Jimmie and Michael compare legacy OCR workflows with modern AI, and why AI no longer depends on rigid templates to extract key data.
         [00:17:00] The importance of partnering with holistic solution providers who can address multiple points of the litigation lifecycle rather than just one narrow problem.
         [00:18:00] How the market has evolved from mom‑and‑pop shops with limited tech budgets to larger litigation support organizations that invest heavily in technology and continuous development.
         [00:19:10] The tension between long‑term SaaS contracts and rapidly evolving legal tech, and why Jimmie favors transactional, "pay as you use it" BPaaS models over long subscriptions.
         [00:22:00] Question 3 introduction: common technology mistakes lawyers make during remote depositions and virtual proceedings.
         [00:22:10] Why general meeting tools like Zoom, while excellent for meetings, are not purpose‑built for litigation or depositions, especially around exhibit management and real‑time annotation.
         [00:24:00] Examples of litigation‑specific functionality: exhibit introduction and management, date stamping, maintaining witness spotlight, and integrating exhibits with the deposition record.
         [00:25:00] Evolution of case management systems from generic workflow tools into legal‑specific platforms tuned to particular practice areas.
         [00:26:00] Emerging litigation tools on the horizon, including facial recognition and facial sentiment software for remote proceedings.
         [00:26:40] Remote depositions post‑COVID: the shift from nearly 100% in‑person to roughly 60–70% remote several years later, and how this forced adoption changed attorney attitudes toward technology.
         [00:27:30] Internal adoption challenges inside medium and large firms: inconsistent workflows, underutilized tools, and the cost of allowing each lawyer to work differently.
         [00:29:00] Why law firms should define and enforce consistent processes for using legal tech solutions to drive efficiency, cost‑effectiveness, and better outcomes.
         [00:30:00] Closing: Jimmie's invitation to learn more about US Legal Support's nationwide litigation support services and where listeners can find him online.
    Resources
    Connect with Jimmie Bridwell
    US Legal Support website: https://www.uslegalsupport.com
    MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE
    Hardware mentioned in the conversation
         Logitech Brio camera - https://www.logitech.com/en-us/products/webcams/brio-4k-hdr-webcam.html
         Surface Pro laptop - https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-pro
         47‑inch curved Samsung monitor - https://www.samsung.com/us/monitors/all-monitors/
    Software & Cloud Services mentioned in the conversation
         Android operating systems and devices - https://www.android.com/
         Apple operating systems and devices - https://www.apple.com/
         Microsoft Cloud and Microsoft Office - https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/onedrive/online-cloud-storage
         Zoom - http://www.zoom.com/
  • The Tech Savvy Lawyer

    🎙️Ep. #137 - Family Online Safety, COPPA 2.0, and AI Chatbots: What Every Lawyer Needs to Know 👩‍⚖️📱

    2026/05/26 | 33 mins.
    My next guest is Andrew Zach, Senior Policy Counsel at the Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI), a Washington, DC–based nonprofit focused on making the online world safer for kids and families through policy, research, digital parenting resources, and industry best practices. Andrew and I dive into how lawyers in any practice area—family law, criminal, corporate, or solo—can build family-centered online safety into their tech stack, from law practice management systems and client portals to AI chatbots, social media, and messaging tools. We unpack COPPA and the coming "COPPA 2.0," emerging age assurance laws, parental responsibility online, and what bar associations should prioritize in CLE programming so lawyers can use technology responsibly while supporting parents and caregivers.
    Join Andrew and me as we discuss the following three questions and more! ⚖️💻
    What are the top three practical steps every lawyer should take to bake in family‑centered online safety when designing client‑facing tech, websites, portals, intake forms, messaging, and social media?
    What are the top three technology tools or configurations law firms should implement to better protect children and teens who may be affected by legal technology, whether they are direct clients in a family matter or simply sharing devices with adult clients?
    If you were advising bar associations and practice‑area leaders, what would be the top three CLE or policy priorities to ensure lawyers responsibly use AI, client portals, and other digital tools while supporting parents and caregivers in keeping families safe online?
    In our conversation, we cover the following ⏱️
    00:00 – Welcoming Andrew and his current tech setup: MacBook Pro, external monitor, iPhones, and wired Bose headphones 🎧
    01:00 – What is FOSI and how it works across policy, digital parenting, and industry best practices to keep families safer online 🌐
    02:00 – COPPA basics: verifiable parental consent for under‑13 data, why COPPA is dated, and the patchwork of state privacy laws filling the federal gap 📜
    03:00 – California privacy leadership, international regimes (like Europe), and why the US needs a comprehensive data privacy law with limits on collection, use, storage, and sale of personal data 🧩
    04:00 – HIPAA, SOC 2, agentic AI chatbots on legal websites, and why notice, consent, and data minimization matter for law firms adopting AI‑driven intake and support tools 🤖
    05:00 – Data minimization as a safeguard when storage or breaches go wrong; retention and disclosure issues in worst‑case scenarios 📂
    05:30 – Handling sensitive images in legal practice (family photos, abuse evidence) and why state‑by‑state rules make it hard to manage online safety and data privacy consistently 🧾
    06:00 – Why a stronger federal law is needed, and what COPPA 2.0 (Children and Teens Online Privacy Protection Act) could change, including raising the age of digital consent and protecting teens from targeted advertising 🎯
    07:00 – Everyday scenarios: sharing kids' photos with family, private messaging vs social media, and why limiting audience and avoiding "questionable" content is critical 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦
    08:00 – Why "private" Facebook accounts with many friends still are not private enough for potentially risky images and what safer sharing looks like 🔒
    09:00 – Keeping audiences limited in litigation and family law contexts while complying with legal guidelines for highly sensitive evidence 📁
    10:00 – Defining age assurance vs age verification, and how tools like facial age estimation, IDs, and self‑declaration fit into online safety compliance 🧑‍💻
    11:00 – International and US examples: UK social media age checks, Australia's age assurance trials, and Texas cases on adult sites and app‑store‑level verification ⚖️
    12:00 – Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton upholding age verification for adult sites versus the App Store Accountability Act's broader mandate and why it was enjoined 🏛️
    13:00 – Financial harm to parents from kids' unsupervised app purchases and concerns about access to "harmful content" through apps and social media 💳
    14:00 – Is there such a thing as "age insurance"? Exploring liability, coverage, and why Andrew is not aware of a product like that 🧾
    15:00 – Apple vs Facebook on data tracking: long terms of service, Apple's "Ask App Not to Track" pop‑up, and "arms race" messaging around personalization and privacy 📲
    16:00 – Communicating data practices clearly to users and kids; age‑appropriate disclosures and the role of legislation in requiring plain‑language privacy notices 🧠
    17:00 – "Kids' accounts" on platforms like Instagram, retrofitting protections vs safety by design, and what private‑by‑default, constrained communication can look like for teens 🧒
    18:00 – Culture of responsibility: six entities in online safety (industry, policymakers, law enforcement, educators, kids, and families) and FOSI's free digital parenting resources 📚
    19:00 – Why expecting parents to customize every app setting is unrealistic and how safety‑by‑design and data‑minimization can reduce that burden 🛠️
    20:00 – Parental responsibility vs platform responsibility, and how making parental controls easier (e.g., YouTube teen account setup time) can encourage meaningful engagement 👪
    21:00 – Recent cases in New Mexico and California: addiction, mental health, platform design, and new legal strategies targeting harms beyond specific content 🧑‍⚖️
    22:00 – The Joe Camel analogy, marketing to kids, and why FOSI avoids equating social media directly with tobacco while still pushing for better design safeguards 🚭
    23:00 – Features like "take a break" and limits on infinite scroll; designing for vulnerable users and younger audiences from the outset 🧱
    24:00 – AI chatbots in legal practice: risks of emotional dependence, mental health harms, and why unregulated bots should not replace trained professionals in sensitive contexts 🧩
    26:00 – How often teens and families are using generative AI, and the emerging theme of stricter rules or disclosures for legal, medical, and financial advice from chatbots 🧮
    27:00 – Disclaimers and transparency for client‑facing chatbots on law firm sites; state‑by‑state experimentation and potential new duties for lawyers using AI in practice 💬
    28:00 – The White House's national AI policy framework, its child‑safety focus, and the need for congressional action, preemption questions, and national standards 🇺🇸
    29:00 – Why bar associations and lawyers should track AI policy developments closely as they intersect with ethics, confidentiality, and family online safety 🔍
    30:00 – FOSI's "good digital parenting" resources, device agreements, and practical scripts for setting expectations with kids about devices and online behavior 📄
    31:00 – Where to find Andrew online, including FOSI's website and his "Andrew the Policy Guy" content on LinkedIn and TikTok 📲
    RESOURCES
    Connect with Andrew 🌐
    Andrew Zach -
    LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-zack-a750b156/
    Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI) – Website: https://www.fosi.org
    Mentioned in the episode 📝
    App Store Accountability Act (proposed Texas law for app‑store‑level age verification) – https://www.spencerfane.com/insight/texas-spearheads-the-app-store-accountability-act-preventing-unauthorized-in-app-purchases-b
    COPPA – Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (US federal kids' privacy law) – https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa
    COPPA 2.0 – Children and Teens Online Privacy Protection Act proposal – https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senators-markey-and-cassidy-reintroduce-coppa-20-bipartisan-legislation-to-protect-children-online
    Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (Texas age‑verification case for adult sites) – https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/23-1122
    HIPAA – Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (health privacy) – https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/php/resources/health-insurance-portability-and-accountability-act-of-1996-hipaa.html
    Kids Online Health and Safety Task Force (US government initiative) – https://www.ntia.gov/programs-and-initiatives/kids-online-health-and-safety
    SOC 2 – Service Organization Control 2 (security and privacy reporting framework) – https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/soc-2
    White House National AI Policy Framework (child‑safety section) – https://www.klgates.com/White-House-Releases-National-AI-Policy-Framework-3-24-2026
    Hardware mentioned in the conversation 🖥️
    Acer external monitor – https://www.acer.com
    Apple Bluetooth Keyboard – https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MLA22LL/A/magic-keyboard
    Apple Bluetooth Mouse (Magic Mouse) – https://www.apple.com/magic-mouse
    Apple iPhone (work and personal devices) – https://www.apple.com/iphone
    Apple MacBook Pro 14‑inch – https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro-14-and-16
    Bose wired over‑ear headphones – https://www.bose.com
    Laptop stand (generic Amazon stand) – https://www.amazon.com (search "laptop stand")
    Software & Cloud Services mentioned in the conversation ☁️
    Apple App Store – https://www.apple.com/app-store
    Facebook – https://www.facebook.com
    Google Play Store – https://play.google.com
    Instagram – https://www.instagram.com
    TikTok – https://www.tiktok.com
    YouTube – https://www.youtube.com
  • The Tech Savvy Lawyer

    🎙️ TSL Lab's Deep Dive into Our May 18, 2027, editorial, "AI Won't Replace Solo and Small Firm Lawyers. It Will Supercharge Them"!

    2026/05/22 | 27 mins.
    Join us for an AI-powered deep dive into the ethical challenges facing legal professionals in the age of generative AI. Join us for an AI-powered deep dive into the ethical challenges facing legal professionals in the age of generative AI. 🤖 In this episode, our Google Notebook LLM bot panelists unpack our May 18th, 2026, editorial, "AI Won't Replace Solo and Small Firm Lawyers. It Will Supercharge Them," and explore how generative AI tools are reshaping daily legal work, supercharging solo and small firm practices, and raising serious questions about competence, confidentiality, and supervision.
    We walk through how AI "unbundles" legal tasks, why Jevons Paradox means more demand for lawyers (not less), and how solo professionals can safely treat AI as the junior associate they do not have to hire but still must supervise. You will come away with practical, ethics-conscious strategies to integrate AI into your workflow without sacrificing judgment, client trust, or your license. ⚖️
    In our conversation, we cover the following
    00:00:00 – Why "doom hype" around AI is targeting the legal profession and why the collapse-of-lawyers narrative falls apart in real life.
    00:01:00 – Introducing Michael D.J. Eisenberg's editorial "AI Won't Replace Solo and Small Firm Lawyers. It Will Supercharge Them."
    00:02:00 – Setting ground rules: educational discussion only and why this episode is not legal advice.
    00:02:30 – Rethinking what a "job" really is and the idea that legal work is a bundle of tasks, not one monolithic activity.
    00:03:00 – Comparing big-firm specialization to the tightly packed bundle of tasks handled by solo and small-firm lawyers.
    00:03:30 – Why AI can pull on individual threads in that bundle, but cannot run the whole practice for you.
    00:04:00 – The solo master-chef metaphor: AI as the kitchen machine doing prep work while the human focuses on taste and judgment. 🍲🤖
    00:05:00 – How AI can draft preliminary summaries or case law lists while the lawyer still owns strategy and verification.
    00:05:30 – The "mental verification" problem: when typing and thinking used to be the same act for lawyers.
    00:06:00 – What changes when AI writes the first draft and why verification must become a separate, deliberate step.
    00:06:30 – The risk of hallucinated filings and viral stories of fake cases generated by AI. 😬
    00:07:00 – Data points showing the profession is adapting, not dying: more lawyers, more bar-required jobs, rising law school interest.
    00:07:30 – Revisiting the e‑discovery panic and predictions that predictive coding would wipe out junior associates.
    00:08:00 – How cheaper e‑discovery led to an explosion of data and actually increased demand for legal work.
    00:08:30 – Introducing Jevons Paradox and why greater efficiency can increase, not decrease, total demand.
    00:09:00 – The widened-highway analogy: more lanes, more traffic, and how that maps onto AI in law. 🛣️
    00:10:00 – How AI lets small firms tackle big, complex matters and offer more predictable flat-fee pricing.
    00:11:00 – Expanding access to legal services for the middle class and why cheaper legal work grows the market.
    00:11:30 – Turning to ethics: ABA Model Rule 1.1 on competence and the duty to understand relevant technology.
    00:12:00 – The solo's burden: you are the IT department and the innovation committee, all at once. ☕💻
    00:12:30 – A practical definition of technological competence for solos and small firms.
    00:13:00 – Starting small with AI: summaries, first-draft emails, and extracting checklists from dense legislation.
    00:13:30 – AI as the "junior associate you don't have to hire but must supervise" under Rules 5.1 and 5.3.
    00:14:00 – Why you remain responsible for AI's output just as you would for a paralegal or junior lawyer.
    00:14:30 – The solo's question: Does it really make sense to write a formal AI policy for just one person?
    00:15:00 – How a short written AI policy creates hard boundaries before you are stressed and rushed.
    00:15:30 – Defining approved uses, high‑review tasks, and absolute "no-go" zones for AI in your practice.
    00:16:00 – Model Rule 1.6 on confidentiality and the special risk solo and small firms face with cloud tools.
    00:16:30 – Why pasting sensitive client facts into a generic consumer chatbot is an ethical minefield.
    00:17:00 – How consumer AI tools tokenize your text and use it to train future models.
    00:17:30 – The "megaphone in a public square" analogy for pasting confidential data into public AI tools. 📣
    00:18:00 – Moving from megaphones to soundproof vaults: using enterprise modes or legal-specific platforms.
    00:18:30 – Why a single data breach can be existential for a solo firm and why clients should care about tool choices.
    00:19:00 – Legislative inflation: constant growth in complex rules, norms, and regulations across jurisdictions.
    00:19:30 – How AI helps solos track regulatory change, generate client alerts, and update templates in real time.
    00:20:00 – Carving out lucrative micro‑niches with AI, such as hyper‑specific regulatory domains.
    00:20:30 – Pairing niche expertise with SEO and content marketing so a solo can compete at scale.
    00:21:00 – The junior lawyer dilemma: what happens to entry-level training when AI eats the grunt work.
    00:21:30 – Why firms still need junior lawyers to build a future bench, not just to type memos.
    00:22:00 – What AI fundamentally cannot do: build trust in person, join community events, or create referral networks.
    00:22:30 – How automation pushes lawyers toward more human-centric, relationship-focused work. ❤️
    00:23:00 – The core conclusion: the real existential threat is the AI-literate competitor down the street, not the robot.
    00:23:30 – Treating AI as a supervised junior associate while protecting ethics, productivity, and client outcomes.
    00:24:00 – Final reflections: mapping your own "bundle of tasks" and deciding what to offload so you can supercharge yourself. ⚡
    RESOURCES
    Mentioned in the episode
    "AI Won't Replace Solo and Small Firm Lawyers. It Will Supercharge Them" – Editorial by Michael D.J. Eisenberg
    https://www.thetechsavvylawyer.page/
    American Bar Association Model Rule 1.1 – Competence
    https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_1_competence/
    American Bar Association Model Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of Information
    https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_6_confidentiality_of_information/
    American Bar Association Model Rule 5.1 – Responsibilities of Partners, Managers, and Supervisory Lawyers
    https://www.thetechsavvylawyer.page/search?q=5.1
    American Bar Association Model Rule 5.3 – Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistance
    https://www.thetechsavvylawyer.page/search?q=5.3
    Damien Charlotin on AI and legal jobs (referenced argument on AI creating more legal work)
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/05/17/ai-isnt-end-legal-profession-its-future/
    Jevons Paradox – economic concept on efficiency and increased demand
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox
    👉 If this episode helps you think more clearly about AI, ethics, and your own "bundle of tasks," share it with a colleague and subscribe so you never miss a future Tech-Savvy Lawyer deep dive. 🚀
More News podcasts
About The Tech Savvy Lawyer
The Tech Savvy Lawyer interviews Judges, Lawyers, and other professionals discussing utilizing technology in the practice of law. It may springboard an idea and help you in your own pursuit of the business we call "practicing law". Please join us for interesting conversations enjoyable at any tech skill level!
Podcast website

Listen to The Tech Savvy Lawyer, Candace and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features