The People’s Court Podcast

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to help him find women to date, but the defendant didn't find any viable mates, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant insists he sent him on a date with a great woman, but he just changed his mind about her services for no reason. Besides, the defendant doesn't provide refunds.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendant pushed her shopping cart into his car, so he's suing for damages. The defendant argues the shopping cart had a bad wheel and that's not her fault.

Plus, the plaintiffs claim their neighbor's toilet overflowed and damaged their belongings. The plaintiffs hired the defendant to restore their belongings, but they ended up all gross and destroyed, so they're suing. The defendant claims he dried and cleaned everything properly. Besides, the plaintiffs signed off on everything.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims her ex-girlfriend borrowed money from her for a car when they were still together. After their breakup, the defendant refused to give back the money, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the reason she needed a car in the first place is because the plaintiff ruined hers.

Then, the plaintiff claims her neighbor flooded her apartment, so she's suing for damages. The defendant argues the flooding wasn't that bad, and he even sent a cleaner to help the neighbors.

Plus, the plaintiff helped the defendant find homes for kittens. However, the defendant hasn't paid the plaintiff the adoption fees, so she's suing. The defendant insists there was no agreement in place on any adoption fees.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff met the defendant at a pool tournament, and they started dating. The plaintiff alleges the defendant got upset with him one day and keyed his furniture and stole his DVDs, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant denies the allegations and thinks the plaintiff's friends probably did it.

Then, the plaintiffs purchased a vehicle from the defendant. They were told it was in pristine condition, but the car was not, so the plaintiffs are suing for false advertisement and repairs. The defendant argues the plaintiffs never complained about the vehicle until eight months later.

Plus, the plaintiff rented an apartment to the defendant, but he disappeared and stiffed him on rent, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues he paid the plaintiff everything he owes.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff agreed to rent a room in the defendant's house. The defendant always brought home strange women, so the plaintiff had to move out. The defendant refuses to return her security, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff moved out without any notice and damaged the carpet. Therefore, he had every right to keep the security deposit.

Then, the plaintiff stored her televisions at the defendant's house. When she went to retrieve them, the defendant said they were stolen, but the plaintiff believes the defendant had something to do with it, so she's suing. The defendant says he went out of his way to help the plaintiff, and he denies the allegations.

Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant damaged his vehicle's bumper outside a hospital, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff is making this all up and just assumed he caused the damage.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff alleges the defendant crashed her car into hers, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff is the one who hit her vehicle.

Then, the plaintiffs hired the defendant to cater their wedding at a historic museum. However, the plaintiffs say the defendant knew the museum was closing, and they had to hire somone else. The plaintiffs are suing for the return of their deposit. The defendant insists he showed the plaintiffs various locations, and he would have been happy to cater the wedding anywhere.

Plus, the plaintiff says her cousin owes her money for work she provided at her day care service, so the plaintiff's suing. The defendant argues she had to fire the plaintiff because she was always late. Besides, the defendant has proof she paid the plaintiff everything she was owed.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices