Powered by RND
PodcastsGovernmentThe Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
Listen to The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court in the App
Listen to The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court in the App
(471)(247,963)
Save favourites
Alarm
Sleep timer

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

Podcast The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible...
More

Available Episodes

5 of 426
  • The 2024 Presidential Election
    So you've won/lost the 2024 Presidential election, what comes next?  Brett and Nazim take some time to vet out what the 2024 election means for the President, the Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies.  Sprinkle in a touch of doom, and just a hint of gloom, and you've got a winning podcast episode.  Law starts from the beginning, with a healthy tangent in the middle about Nazim dressed in a hot-dog man costume. *Technical issue with episode has been fixed.
    --------  
    1:06:25
  • The Rise and Fall of Chevron
    This week's episode discusses Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, in which the Supreme Court overruled the Chevron doctrine, but not before discussing the potential success of lawsuits challenging the change in the Democratic candidate for President, and later discussing the many mysteries of the open ocean.  It's an action-packed episode, folks.  Law starts from the beginning.
    --------  
    54:25
  • Trump Immunity Decision
    This week's episode covers Trump v. U.S., which deals with the Court's new test for Presidential Immunity, how that test applies to former President Donald Trump, and whether Brett can talk Nazim off a ledge over the whole thing.  Law starts from the beginning.
    --------  
    1:09:39
  • 50 Shades of Originalism
    This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences.  Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means.  Law starts at (02:22).
    --------  
    50:09
  • Abortion & Guns (Civ Pro & Statutory Interpretation)
    This week's episode covers the cases of FDA v. Doctor's for Hippocratic Medicine and Cargill v. Garland, which deal with big legal issues in small legal ways.  The podcast starts by also discussing Big Sam Alito's recently foibles with judicial ethics and ends with a discussion on dance recital season.  The law basically starts from the beginning if you'll indulge a small anecdote.
    --------  
    49:59

More Government podcasts

About The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

Podcast website

Listen to The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court, HARDtalk and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court: Podcasts in Family

Radio
Social
v6.30.1 | © 2007-2024 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 12/7/2024 - 6:12:53 AM