Soil health adoption doesn’t fail because farmers “don’t care”—it fails because the evidence chain is often incomplete. In this episode, we unpack the Soil Health Cycle (SHC): a feedback framework that connects people and motivations → management practices → measurable soil health indicators → ecosystem services → economic outcomes, then loops back to improve decisions over time.
Based on a systematic review of studies (2000–2022), a major gap shows up repeatedly: most research measures practices and soil indicators, but doesn’t simultaneously link biological indicators to profitability and productivity outcomes. That missing connection weakens incentives, slows adoption, and limits policy effectiveness.
In this episode, you’ll learn:
What the SHC framework is and how it functions as an iterative monitoring system
Which soil health indicators are most often measured—and what’s missing
Why “ecosystem services” (water regulation, nutrient cycling, resilience) need clearer economic translation
How better reporting and paired bio + economic metrics could accelerate conservation practice adoption
If you want soil health to scale, we need consistent reporting that ties soil function to outcomes farmers and policymakers can act on—yield stability, risk reduction, and profitability.
Reference materials:
Soil Health Cycle