Sanity Check

Hypocrisy in climate politics raises questions about fairness, accountability, and the standards applied to public officials. In this episode, Dr. David Legates examines the controversy surrounding Justice Samuel Alito’s recusal from a Supreme Court case involving climate litigation against oil and gas companies, alongside the Senate’s rejection of legislation aimed at restricting congressional stock trading. Why do some officials face demands for impartiality while others appear exempt from similar expectations? And how should Christians respond when political opponents apply inconsistent standards? Drawing on history, political philosophy, and Scripture, Dr. Legates challenges listeners to consider whether fighting hypocrisy requires adopting an opponent’s tactics or holding fast to Biblical principles of integrity, righteousness, and overcoming evil with good.
Visit our podcast resource page: https://cornwallalliance.org/listen%20to%20our%20podcast%20created%20to%20reign/

Our work is entirely supported by donations from people like you. If you benefit from our work and would like to partner with us, please visit www.cornwallalliance.org/donate.

Can Christians glorify God through conventional agriculture, or does faithful stewardship require regenerative or small-scale farming? In this episode of Sanity Check, Dr. E. Calvin Beisner responds to a Christian farmer who feels discouraged by claims that conventional agriculture is incompatible with Biblical stewardship.
Dr. Beisner examines the tradeoffs between conventional and regenerative agriculture, asking how farmers should weigh land, labor, capital, environmental impacts, and food production when evaluating different agricultural methods. He explains why no single farming method should be treated as inherently Christian and why faithful stewardship requires farmers to consider the particular land, resources, and constraints they face.
Dr. Beisner also recommends resources for Christians seeking a balanced perspective on agriculture and encourages farmers to pursue their vocations with excellence while continuing to improve their stewardship of God’s creation. Whatever agricultural methods they use, Christian farmers can glorify God through their work and serve their neighbors by helping provide the food people need.
https://cornwallalliance.org/is-conventional-agriculture-incompatible-with-the-christian-worldview/
Visit our podcast resource page: https://cornwallalliance.org/listen%20to%20our%20podcast%20created%20to%20reign/

Our work is entirely supported by donations from people like you. If you benefit from our work and would like to partner with us, please visit www.cornwallalliance.org/donate.

What does Diet Coke have to do with America’s energy supply? In this episode, Dr. David Legates explores that question through a surprising comparison from James Taylor of the Heartland Institute. Taylor’s Diet Coke analogy exposes the flaw in politicians’ “all-of-the-above” approach to energy: when expensive sources enter the electricity mix, consumers can end up paying more for power while receiving less reliable service.
As coal and natural-gas plants close, electricity demand continues rising from data centers and other energy-intensive industries. Meanwhile, policymakers are investing in wind, solar, batteries, hydrogen, offshore wind, and other alternatives while treating fossil fuels as a problem rather than a source of reliable energy. Dr. Legates examines what those choices mean for electricity prices, grid reliability, taxpayers, and ratepayers—and why America’s energy policies could leave households paying more to keep the lights on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEXOVoyyo7c
https://epsa.org/understanding-the-costs-of-integrating-energy-resources-in-pjm-analyzing-full-cycle-levelized-costs-of-electricity/

Visit our podcast resource page: https://cornwallalliance.org/listen%20to%20our%20podcast%20created%20to%20reign/

Our work is entirely supported by donations from people like you. If you benefit from our work and would like to partner with us, please visit www.cornwallalliance.org/donate.

For nearly two decades, the EPA’s 2009 Endangerment Finding has served as a legal foundation for federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. Its history begins with the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, continues through the Obama administration’s Endangerment Finding, and extends through the greenhouse gas regulations adopted under subsequent administrations.
In February 2026, the Trump EPA rescinded the Endangerment Finding as it applied to motor vehicles and repealed the federal greenhouse gas standards that followed from it. In September, EPA finalized a major repeal of greenhouse gas requirements for fossil-fuel-fired power plants while proposing to rescind the remaining greenhouse gas findings and regulations governing the power sector.
What does all of this mean for federal climate regulation?
In this episode, we trace the legal history behind the Endangerment Finding, examine the scientific and regulatory arguments surrounding it, and explain how a provision of the Clean Air Act became the foundation for decades of federal greenhouse gas regulation. We also examine what the 2026 EPA actions actually changed, what remains in place, and what Congress, the courts, states, and future administrations could still do.
The Endangerment Finding has been at the center of the legal battle over greenhouse gas regulation for years. Understanding its history helps explain why its reversal represents such a significant shift in federal environmental policy—and why the future of that policy remains unsettled.
https://www.epa.gov/climate-change/endangerment-and-cause-or-contribute-findings-greenhouse-gases-under-section-202a

https://apnews.com/article/epa-power-plants-trump-coal-gas-climate-cac1c2c75f8656d8eaf5f0a240edae15

Visit our podcast resource page: https://cornwallalliance.org/listen%20to%20our%20podcast%20created%20to%20reign/

Our work is entirely supported by donations from people like you. If you benefit from our work and would like to partner with us, please visit www.cornwallalliance.org/donate.

What can a devastating Himalayan avalanche teach us about climate change—and about the growing role of artificial intelligence in scientific research?
In this episode, Dr. David Legates examines claims that a catastrophic 2026 avalanche in Nepal was caused by human-induced climate change. He explains why individual weather and climate events cannot simply be attributed to climate change and puts the disaster in historical context by comparing it with other major glacial and rock-ice avalanches.
But the discussion takes an unexpected turn when Dr. Legates examines the research paper that prompted his investigation. The paper was generated entirely by AI and explicitly acknowledged that it had not undergone peer review or human verification. That raises a much larger question: When AI conducts research and produces convincing scientific prose, who is responsible for the claims it makes?
Dr. Legates discusses both the promise and limitations of AI as a research tool, arguing that AI can be a powerful force multiplier—but that human expertise, critical thinking, and verification cannot be outsourced.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/413842707_The_Nepal_Avalanche_26_Aug_2026_an_unprecedented_event_A_comparative_historical_assessment
https://www.stimson.org/2026/a-cascading-disaster-on-the-china-nepal-border-what-to-know-about-the-august-2026-rasuwa-flood/

Visit our podcast resource page: https://cornwallalliance.org/listen%20to%20our%20podcast%20created%20to%20reign/

Our work is entirely supported by donations from people like you. If you benefit from our work and would like to partner with us, please visit www.cornwallalliance.org/donate.