Human Meme

In September of 1994, a young woman drove a dust-colored Ford wagon out to a farmhouse south of Madrid, Nebraska. She was twenty-six years old. Her notary commission was days old. Her job was small. Watch a widow sign a quitclaim deed. Stamp the page. Take the fee. Drive home. Ordinary work, in an ordinary county. The widow sat at her own kitchen table in her good gray coat, the one with the brooch. Her daughter wasn't in the room. The son-in-law did all the talking, in the county's reasonable voice, the kind that has an answer for everything. And when the widow went to sign, her hand was trembling, and the page moved a little with the trembling, and the son-in-law put his thumb on the page to hold it flat. His thumb never touched her hand.

Every oath, everywhere, started life as a conditional self-curse. And then, century by century, the curse got amputated. First the punisher went quiet. Then the punishment went silent. What stayed in the witness's mouth was the stump. But nothing that load-bearing just disappears. The punishment clause went looking for a new address. And the law, slowly, took the job over. In fifteen sixty-three, in the fifth year of Elizabeth, Parliament passed a statute whose title you can still read: An Act for the Punishment of such persons as shall procure or commit any willful Perjury. That's the birth of perjury as a crime.

In 2003, a laboratory asked the plainest question you can put to the night: when dreams draw on waking life, what do they take? Twenty-nine people kept logs for two weeks. The answer came back in two numbers. Two-thirds of everything these sleepers remembered dreaming drew identifiably on the days around it. And a whole day, replayed intact with its time and place still attached, showed up in one or two dreams in a hundred. The day gets in as parts. The day itself almost never arrives whole. And if you want the grimmest proof, it is on the record. After the eleventh of September, 2001, when the whole country watched the same footage on every screen, researchers went looking for the replay in the dream journals of forty-four Americans, eight hundred and eighty dreams across the date.

Here is a game. I am going to spend the next several minutes telling you about a book, and I will not say its name once. The name is four words. Two of them are the same word. If you follow the grammar, by the end of this episode you will say the name yourself, and you will know why it could not have been anything else. If you have listened to this show for a long time, you have heard the four words before: in 2020, and again last June. Today they get a whole episode, unsaid. The game starts on June eighth, 2016. At two thirty-seven that afternoon, a 723-word essay went up on my blog: an essay about Aristotelian politics in an age of unreason.

A friend of mine once cleared a bookshelf with one sentence. It took him a week to collect. I have spent twenty years understanding that afternoon, and the understanding became a book. Let me tell you the story first. The store was a Mormon bookstore, an independent, living on the trade of the wards around it. My friend belonged to that trade twice over, as a customer and as a lay officer of the church the store served. He worked in technology all week, and on Sundays he presided over a congregation. He was the bishop of his ward. That is an unpaid office, and a heavy one, and it mattered that day, because of the name it let him borrow. Understand what that borrowing did, because the whole book lives inside it. On his own name, my friend had an opinion about children's paperbacks, and the owner would have heard an opinion and sold the next copy.