The WallBuilders Show

Want to see how ideas become laws that change lives? We trace a straight line from primary-source history to modern policy, then unpack how Texas advanced a billion-dollar school choice program while strengthening religious liberty protections. With Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, we dive into the long-game strategy behind expanding parental rights, why competition can lift outcomes for every student, and how teacher pay and public school funding fit into a balanced plan that keeps classrooms strong.

We start with something rare in politics: receipts you can hold. From Revolutionary-era Bibles and George Washington’s orders, to WWII chaplain records, we share artifacts that demonstrate how faith once operated in America’s civic and military life. When people see history up close, the debate shifts. Instead of arguing abstractions, we face a record that shows religious expression as a durable thread in our national fabric—not an intrusion to be scrubbed away.

From there, we break down the architecture of Texas’s program: a billion dollars in year one for roughly 100,000 students, clear pathways for families in need, and continued investment in public schools, including significant teacher pay raises. Worried that choice will drain districts? The numbers tell a different story, with 5.5 million students still in public schools and new incentives for districts to improve. Concerned about strings for private or homeschool families? Participation remains a choice; those who want full independence can simply decline funds.

We also face the cultural headwinds: DEI mandates, curriculum revisions that sideline core history, and policies that blur parental rights. Every law reflects someone’s morality; the founders argued that liberty needs a moral backbone to last. By restoring religious liberty and empowering parents, we create room for conscience, competition, and genuine excellence to thrive together. The theme we return to is courage—contending earnestly for what’s true while leading with love.

If you’re passionate about education freedom, faith in public life, or practical reforms that respect teachers and empower families, this conversation brings clarity and a path forward. Subscribe, share this episode with a friend who’s wrestling with these questions, and leave a review with your biggest takeaway—we read every one.
Support the show

What if the most important fight for your faith happens before November? We bring the energy and get practical about why primaries carry outsized influence, how to find trustworthy voter guides, and where small turnouts can swing big outcomes. Then we go deep on religious liberty with Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who chairs President Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission, to unpack what the hearings are revealing and what can actually change.

You’ll hear the human side of constitutional rights: a Navy SEAL near retirement punished for a faith‑based vaccine objection, a fifth grader pushed to read a transgender book to first graders, a teacher sidelined for refusing to remove a cross, and a valedictorian told to strip God from his speech. These aren’t hypotheticals; they’re case studies showing how confusion about the First Amendment collides with daily life in schools and the military. Dan walks us through the Commission’s mission—clarifying when and where prayer and religious expression are protected, documenting violations across faiths, and shaping durable policy through DOJ action, legislation, and executive orders that stand beyond one administration.

We also tackle a heated moment inside the Commission itself: an attempt to derail a hearing with anti‑Semitic rhetoric and political grandstanding. The swift removal of the member, and clear words from leaders like Franklin Graham and Cardinal Dolan, refocused the work on protecting people of faith—Christian, Jewish, Sikh, and others—without weaponizing theology against civil rights. Along the way, we connect the dots between America’s historic tradition of chaplaincy and conscience in the military and today’s need to enforce good laws already on the books.

If you care about faith, free speech, and the ballot, this conversation maps the path from outrage to action—starting with your primary. Listen, share with a friend who needs clarity, and subscribe so you never miss a strategy that turns conviction into change.
Support the show

What would you do if changing your faith made you a target—and the people sworn to protect you hesitated out of fear of a label? We sit down with a former Muslim from the UK who lays out, in stark detail, how harassment turned into arson, how isolation bred despair, and how a brutal street attack finally forced his family into hiding. His story isn’t shared for shock value; it’s a stress test of our core freedoms and a warning about what happens when public officials let accusations of “phobia” outrank evidence, threats, and the equal protection of the law.

Across the hour, we connect personal testimony to broader civic patterns: churches sold and converted, local councils won through bloc voting, and police culture shaped more by public relations than public safety. We open the books—including the Reliance of the Traveller and a contemporary text on Islamic law—to show how apostasy is treated and why that matters for anyone who cares about freedom of conscience. Our aim is not to inflame but to inform: to give listeners a clear view of the stakes when doctrine is used to rationalize intimidation, and when communities go quiet as neighbors face escalating harm.

We also get practical. How can cities protect ex-Muslims and other at-risk dissenters? What must change in policing, prosecution, and community organizing to make sure the law is applied evenly? We outline steps any listener can champion: document threats, insist on neutral enforcement, build support networks for converts, and show up—at council meetings, in courtrooms, and for families under pressure. Courage is contagious, but it needs structure.

Want the full two-hour forum and deeper dive with our scholars? Watch on Facebook at Patriot Rick Green or at PatriotU.com. If this conversation moved you, share it, leave a review, and subscribe so more people hear what’s at stake—and how we can act together.
Support the show

Freedom doesn’t vanish overnight—it erodes when we forget what we stand for and hesitate to defend it. We dive straight into the collision of Sharia law with constitutional liberty, outlining why abrogation matters, why enforcement beats rhetoric, and why Texas is uniquely positioned to set a national precedent. With Frank Gaffney, Bill Federer, and more voices at the table, we trace a strategy from “tavern talk” to the ballot box: make the threat legible, win a public mandate, and operationalize it through clear laws, candidate accountability, and focused law enforcement.

We lay out the stakes with specificity: what Sharia means in practice; why later doctrinal interpretations shape governance claims; and how groups accused of advancing illiberal aims fit into a modern legal framework. Then we pivot to action—five words on the Texas primary ballot that could spark a wider movement: “Texas should prohibit Sharia law.” The message is simple but decisive: ask every candidate where they stand and make the answer consequential. We look to Reagan’s playbook for confronting totalitarian threats, turning principle into policy and public will into durable action.

The most searing moments come from Nissar Hussein, a former Muslim who faced threats for apostasy. His story personalizes abstract debate: when leaving a faith invites violence, the bedrock of religious liberty crumbles. He warns that the gap between the UK and the United States may be smaller than many think, urging vigilance before norms reset. Alongside that warning, we return to first principles: restore civic memory, teach constitutional guardrails, and practice the habits that keep a free people free.

If you care about religious liberty, constitutional law, and the practical steps that turn conviction into policy, this is your roadmap. Listen, share with a friend who votes, and leave a review to help more people find the show. Then ask your candidates—local to federal—exactly where they stand on Sharia and what they’ll do about it.
Support the show

A packed room, a raised question: how do we safeguard genuine religious freedom while resisting a system that treats law, politics, and belief as one instrument of control. We gathered a unique panel—historian Bill Federer, national security voice Frank Gaffney, and advocate Nissar Hussain—to cut through noise and name the stakes. From the legal misunderstandings that haunted the First Amendment for decades to the recent course-correction in the courts, we explore why definitions matter. If liberty means anything, it must include the courage to say no to practices that violate equal protection, due process, and the dignity of women and dissenters.

We trace the timeline many avoid: Muhammad’s early years in Mecca marked by persuasion, followed by the Medina turn where governance, warfare, and law fused into a total system—what we now call Sharia. This history isn’t theology class; it’s a user’s manual for understanding how political Islam advances, how it frames power, and why some societies struggle once parallel legal norms begin to surface. Europe’s arc—heritage to secularization to rising Islamist influence—offers concrete lessons: concessions stack, intimidation chills speech, and courts can drift when citizens are afraid to speak plainly.

Then we get practical. Frank walks through a simple standard: if any religiously justified act breaches constitutional rights, the state intervenes—impartially, consistently, and early. We talk model legislation that keeps foreign legal codes from overruling American rights in family or contract law; civic education that teaches young people the First Amendment’s true boundaries; and real community safeguards against intimidation. Nissar’s experience underscores what’s at stake for those who leave Islam or challenge orthodoxies: without clear law and a culture of courage, the most vulnerable go unprotected.

We close with a grounded optimism: Americans can defend both faith and freedom by returning to first principles—equal law for every person, no exceptions. If this conversation sharpened your thinking, share it with a friend, rate the show, and hit subscribe so you don’t miss the next chapter of this series. Your voice shapes the public square—what will you stand for today?
Support the show